Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sadly there was yet another person hit by a train at Southall on
Monday evening (yesterday). http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/co...c=669.msg87663 This is very sad - but why so many at Southall anyway? It does seem to be a regular occurance. Anyway you would have thought that First Great Western might have had a contingency plan for such occurrences by now. However the situation at Paddington was complete chaos. At 9.30 pm when I s was there all the destination board said was Delayed or Cancelled for *every train* - Local, Intercity, and Airport. The concourse was packed with late commuters trying to get home, yet with no means of doing so. There were no FGW or BAA HEX or Network Rail duty managers in sight. Apparently they'd all gone home. There were no extra staff drafted in to help inform the crowds. There were no Transport Police / Community Officers in sight. All of the gateline staff had gone home, and all the gates were left open. On the concourse one Information Desk was closed, on the other there were just two staff to deal with the hoard of by now very frustrated passengers. yet they had no information to give out except what was displayed on the destination board - which said Delayed or Cancelled. It was apparent that failing the appearance on any management no-one knew what was going on and had no means of finding out. There were no alternative transport arrangements available, i.e. with coaches or buses, for getting airline travellers (laden with luggage) to Heathrow - all of the BAA's HEX and CON services were all cancelled to about 22.00. Hundreds of passengers must have missed their flights. Southall has six lines / three pairs. If the incident affected say the slow lines then there are at leastthe fast and freight lines that could have been used as a local diversion. Even if the fast lines had been affected then at least the slow and freight lines could have been used. Whilst it is sad that yet another person from Southall ws hit by a train, it is unacceptable for Paddington to be reduced into chaos yet again for the lack of any leadership or even appearance of any managers or extra staff. SB |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
One person has lost their life, many others will be affected for
months or possibly even years by the experience...but hey, some people might get home an hour or two late! Oh no! Thats infinately more important than making sure that there arent bits of body lying about, or checking the need to preserve a possible crime scene - just send trains along the other lines! Oh, and there must be loads of staff to tell abusive passengers who cant comprehend announcements or displays that no, they dont know when or if their train will run. Sorry for being flippant, but it happens. Poor people in poor areas end their miserable lives. People going home from work get delayed. Trains are cancelled. Staff get shouted at because they dont have crystal balls. Its not going to change, so my advice is to go and find a café, have a sit down and stop being so angry when compared to the poor unfortunate who died and the poor unfortunate's who have to clear up the result you have VERY little to complain about. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 5, 2:31*am, Chris Sanderson wrote:
One person has lost their life, many others will be affected for months or possibly even years by the experience...but hey, some people might get home an hour or two late! Oh no! Thats infinately more important than making sure that there arent bits of body lying about, or checking the need to preserve a possible crime scene - just send trains along the other lines! Oh, and there must be loads of staff to tell abusive passengers who cant comprehend announcements or displays that no, they dont know when or if their train will run. Sorry for being flippant, but it happens. Poor people in poor areas end their miserable lives. People going home from work get delayed. Trains are cancelled. Staff get shouted at because they dont have crystal balls. Its not going to change, so my advice is to go and find a café, have a sit down and stop being so angry when compared to the poor unfortunate who died and the poor unfortunate's who have to clear up the result you have VERY little to complain about. Maybe so, but its us what have to suffer the delays and the railways should have a contingecy for when events like this happen but the truth is theyre just not interested in going out of there way if its going to cost them to bring in buses/coaches/taxis when they can just put there hands up and say its network rails fault. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 5, 2:31*am, Chris Sanderson wrote:
One person has lost their life, many others will be affected for months or possibly even years by the experience...but hey, some people might get home an hour or two late! Oh no! Thats infinately more important than making sure that there arent bits of body lying about, or checking the need to preserve a possible crime scene - just send trains along the other lines! Oh, and there must be loads of staff to tell abusive passengers who cant comprehend announcements or displays that no, they dont know when or if their train will run. Sorry for being flippant, but it happens. Poor people in poor areas end their miserable lives. People going home from work get delayed. Trains are cancelled. Staff get shouted at because they dont have crystal balls. Its not going to change, so my advice is to go and find a café, have a sit down and stop being so angry when compared to the poor unfortunate who died and the poor unfortunate's who have to clear up the result you have VERY little to complain about. Yes it happens, alas - that's why there should be some contingency planning. Tim |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 5, 3:31*am, Chris Sanderson wrote:
One person has lost their life, many others will be affected for months or possibly even years by the experience...but hey, some people might get home an hour or two late! Oh no! Thats infinately more important than making sure that there arent bits of body lying about, or checking the need to preserve a possible crime scene - just send trains along the other lines! Oh, and there must be loads of staff to tell abusive passengers who cant comprehend announcements or displays that no, they dont know when or if their train will run. Sorry for being flippant, but it happens. Poor people in poor areas end their miserable lives. People going home from work get delayed. Trains are cancelled. Staff get shouted at because they dont have crystal balls. Its not going to change, so my advice is to go and find a café, have a sit down and stop being so angry when compared to the poor unfortunate who died and the poor unfortunate's who have to clear up the result you have VERY little to complain about. Perhaps we should have declared a day of national mourning and stopped all work from happening anywhere. If everything is in chaos and nothing running at 21.00, for farther flung destinations (Paddington is, after all, an intercity station), we are starting to get into "last train" times. If you're a couple of hundred miles from home and your only route home is cancelled, it's a little more serious than "go to a cafe and come back later", because "later" could well be tomorrow morning. Would you be happy to be dumped in a railway station 200 miles from home overnight with nowhere to stay under such circumstances? It's not just a question of "damn the crime scene, get the trains running", there are other railway lines and other ways of getting there (eg via Waterloo, coaches). Robin |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 5, 9:31*am, bob wrote:
It's not just a question of "damn the crime scene, get the trains running", there are other railway lines and other ways of getting there (eg via Waterloo, coaches). And a passenger is ill-advised to act outside staff advice at that time of night, as if they're then stranded you can be sure "it's your own fault" will be the answer. So there needed to be staff to decide what to do and to confirm it to passengers. Neil |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Neil Williams wrote:
On Apr 5, 9:31*am, bob wrote: It's not just a question of "damn the crime scene, get the trains running", there are other railway lines and other ways of getting there (eg via Waterloo, coaches). And a passenger is ill-advised to act outside staff advice at that time of night, as if they're then stranded you can be sure "it's your own fault" will be the answer. So there needed to be staff to decide what to do and to confirm it to passengers. Until those investigating at the scene have actually said, "okay, we've finished now" all rail staff can do is offer guesses, though. Information about alternative routes home could also be overtaken by events - e.g. people being directed to H&C line trains by fGW staff could find them cancelled because of overcrowding. It's very hard to come up with a one-size-fits-all answer in these circumstances, apart from "keep calm and carry on". -- ..sig down for maintenance |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 5, 11:12*am, Chris Tolley (ukonline
really) wrote: Until those investigating at the scene have actually said, "okay, we've finished now" all rail staff can do is offer guesses, though. What they can do is offer the ability to say "we were told to do that". Which can be very useful when someone gets stuck further down the line. They can also reassure people that they aren't being ignored. The LUL requirement for a "we are being held at a red signal" announcement after N minutes (N=2?) is a good example. It does not provide useful information, but it does provide reassurance that someone gives a monkeys about the passengers and they are not just an operational inconvenience. It's very hard to come up with a one-size-fits-all answer in these circumstances, apart from "keep calm and carry on". And reassurance. The human factor is very important, but often neglected. Oddly, said human factor can sometimes be provided via technology. I find LM's Twitter feed very good for this. Neil |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 5, 11:12*am, Chris Tolley (ukonline
really) wrote: Neil Williams wrote: On Apr 5, 9:31 am, bob wrote: It's not just a question of "damn the crime scene, get the trains running", there are other railway lines and other ways of getting there (eg via Waterloo, coaches). And a passenger is ill-advised to act outside staff advice at that time of night, as if they're then stranded you can be sure "it's your own fault" will be the answer. *So there needed to be staff to decide what to do and to confirm it to passengers. Until those investigating at the scene have actually said, "okay, we've finished now" all rail staff can do is offer guesses, though. Information about alternative routes home could also be overtaken by events - e.g. people being directed to H&C line trains by fGW staff could find them cancelled because of overcrowding. It's very hard to come up with a one-size-fits-all answer in these circumstances, apart from "keep calm and carry on". The problem is the railways are not following a "keep calm, carry on" approach, they are following a "pack up and go home" approach, leaving passengers stranded. There should be contingency plans for how to deal with the closure of key points on the network, ready to act on with half an hour's notice. It should be clear to management within half an hour whether the situation is a "open again in a few minutes" or "closed for the rest of the evening" situation. For management to just sit on that information and neither pass it on, nor advise passengers (who may have train-specific non flexible tickets) how to go about getting home, nor give them advice on alternative routes that are available, is bad management. Just sticking a "we're really sorry, your train is cancelled" message on the information display is not a contingency plan, and it's not keeping calm and carrying on. Robin |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Chris Sanderson" wrote in message ... One person has lost their life, many others will be affected for months or possibly even years by the experience...but hey, some people might get home an hour or two late! Oh no! Thats infinately more important than making sure that there arent bits of body lying about, or checking the need to preserve a possible crime scene - just send trains along the other lines! Oh, and there must be loads of staff to tell abusive passengers who cant comprehend announcements or displays that no, they dont know when or if their train will run. Sorry for being flippant, but it happens. Poor people in poor areas end their miserable lives. People going home from work get delayed. Trains are cancelled. Staff get shouted at because they dont have crystal balls. Its not going to change, so my advice is to go and find a café, have a sit down and stop being so angry when compared to the poor unfortunate who died and the poor unfortunate's who have to clear up the result you have VERY little to complain about. If it happened once a year you might have a point. Sadly Paddington to Reading seems to have rather a lot of fatalities, recently there were two in a day. So it's hardly surprising that regular travellers will get fed up. I've been lucky having only been affected by two, once on the train and once stuck at Reading. John |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Massive Disruption at Paddington - ALL day Thurs / Fri | London Transport | |||
Massive Disruption at Paddington - Friday Evening Rush Hour | London Transport | |||
MASSIVE DISRUPTION AT READING - SAT 28 / 1 / 2012 | London Transport | |||
Massive Disruption at Paddington - Suicide at Hayes & Harlington | London Transport | |||
Massive Disruption at Paddington | London Transport |