Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote: Mizter T wrote: wrote: Railist wrote: Then I found this: https://custserv.tfl.gov.uk/icss_csi...ewTabtext=Tube TfL seems to have taken that page down since you posted the link to it, although it is still available in Google's cache for now: [snip massive URL] or http://tinyurl.com/Tube-Photo-Rule-Cache The fact that TfL is secretly trying to hide or remove its more helpful rules like this is proof that it, like all public transport organisations, is full of evil, sadistic *******s who like nothing more than any flimsy excuse to make their unlucky customers suffer as much as possible. No Pippa, it's because the 'custserv' system which is used for the FAQ section on the TfL website uses dynamic URLs or somesuch which can't be used to directly hyperlink to particular FAQs Interesting. Thanks for that. Of course, the real question is why TfL goes out of its way to use a system that automatically hides/changes URLs all the time? What is it trying to hide? It's quite annoying, I fully agree - for their FAQs (IIRC there were separate LU and Oyster FAQs), TfL used to use the widely implemented 'custhelp' system (from a company called RightNow) which did produce static URLs which could be quited elsewhere - I dunno if the newer 'custserv' system is from the same company, but it seems to be a rather more comprehensive combined FAQ and contact tool/interface - it handles a whole range of contact possibilities for TfL as a whole (complaints / suggestions / report lost property / street faults etc) as well as the FAQs ("Search Common Questions") - you can see that this all sits together in the same interface he http://www.tfl.gov.uk/contact (The above is a pseudo-address which actually takes you straight into the 'custserv' pages.) I've probably used all the wrong terminology above - the 'custserv' and 'custhelp' descriptions I used feature in the respective URLs - for example, here's a couple of example of the 'custhelp' system in current use... ....by TheTrainline... http://thetrainline.custhelp.com/ ....and BT... http://bt.custhelp.com/ - less than ideal, I fully grant you, however the TfL webmaster is not sitting and monitoring discussion on usenet or traffic flow to particular webpages and then taking them down when they get mentioned or get too popular. Well, of course, if the system has been set up to hide webpages from people automatically, then obviously the webmaster doesn't need to do it himself. See above - it's an annoying feature of this particular system, and I think it's a pretty safe bet it's an off-the-shelf system rather than being one designed specifically by/for TfL. Sorry, I realise that doesn't follow the script of abject paranoia. Let me try again... Yes Pippa, it's hard to believe it but it seems you've finally found proof that operatives sit in the TfL Lair Of Doom buried deep under London looking for ways to purposefully frustrate everyone - they monitor all communications, and are perpetually tinkering with things so as to cause frustration so as to please their twisted psyches. Even when you do encounter supposed helpfulness, if you look deep into their eyes you'll see the tell tale giveaway signs that they aren't like you or I, but are in fact lizards, who exist here on earth to fulfill some devilish masterplan so obscure and unfathomable that we can merely wonder and shudder at their fundamental evil. Sorry to disappoint you. I'm not that kind of a conspiracy theorist, and there's no masterplan beyond simple human nature. After all, Public Transport will always be something that no-one wants to use, unless they reluctantly have to as a last resort. It's only natural that people working in/for it end up sadistically taking advantage of this, enjoying schadenfreude over our misery, and finding ways to increase it. We'd all do the same if we were in their shoes. I know many many people who want to use public transport (no, not just me) - you shouldn't project your own thoughts onto the populace at large. Even if one goes along with the premise of your first sentence, I'm left wondering at your world view, what with all this 'natural' sadism and enjoyment of misery that again you seem to think are traits which are or would be shared by everyone else. On a lighter note, have you met Boltar? I reckon you two would get on famously. No. Although he talks a lot of good sense about transport, on just about everything else he's a useless piece of evil right-wing ****. I mean, he actually thinks the recent rioters were bad guys, instead of the plucky little heroes standing up against the bourgeois control- freaks running the powers that be. How wrong could he get? If he turns up then you can both enjoy a nice troll fight together. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Security alert at Bushey station needed 20 squad cars ? | London Transport | |||
New National Security Technology ignored that might have stopped the bombing | London Transport | |||
removing staff? What happens to security? | London Transport | |||
How do you enter your security answer on the Oyster Sales site? | London Transport | |||
Security of Oyster Cards | London Transport |