"Roland Perry" wrote in message
...
In message , at 18:12:52 on Mon, 6 Jun
2011, tim.... remarked:
I hope it's more than just one extra train!

It will probably be one per "end of line". Is that what you meant?

No, I don't think one train, late enough for the stragglers, will be good
enough for the majority of midnight travellers.

I think that's all most routes are going to get :-(


The timetable has apparently been "released" but is not public. When we
can see it, then these questions will be answered.

For one thing, as in my examples up thread, they need to be taking
people
further from London than is traditional on a train starting at 9pm+ (I
recall when the last train home to Westbury from Paddington was a
party-pooping 8.30pm,

It still is.

Westbury is a poor example. It's a tiny place that just happens to have a
main line next to it. There are bigger places in the area that get no
trains at all!

And which therefore use Westbury as a railhead. (I used to drive there
from Frome, for example).

And can equally use Bath as a railhead


Places West of Westbury are served by later trains running via Bristol

The 20.35 is listed as the last train to Plymouth, the last to Taunton and
Exeter is 21.45 (I'm ignoring the sleeper).

Why? What wrong with the sleeper?

tim

In message , at 13:34:53 on Tue, 7 Jun
2011, tim.... remarked:
Westbury is a poor example. It's a tiny place that just happens to have a
main line next to it. There are bigger places in the area that get no
trains at all!

And which therefore use Westbury as a railhead. (I used to drive there
from Frome, for example).

And can equally use Bath as a railhead

In the general case - you have to be kidding! Dreadful journey, twice as
far, horrible parking. For the Olympics, maybe people willing to drive
for half an hour at 1.30am could use Bath instead.

Places West of Westbury are served by later trains running via Bristol

The 20.35 is listed as the last train to Plymouth, the last to Taunton and
Exeter is 21.45 (I'm ignoring the sleeper).

Why? What wrong with the sleeper?

Because there are a very limited number of sleeper routes (and sleeper
capacity), and so you can't rely on a sleeper train to mop up all the
late stragglers from the Olympics. You need other trains too.
--
Roland Perry

"Roland Perry" wrote in message
...
In message , at 13:34:53 on Tue, 7 Jun
2011, tim.... remarked:
Westbury is a poor example. It's a tiny place that just happens to have
a
main line next to it. There are bigger places in the area that get no
trains at all!

And which therefore use Westbury as a railhead. (I used to drive there
from Frome, for example).

And can equally use Bath as a railhead

In the general case - you have to be kidding! Dreadful journey, twice as
far, horrible parking. For the Olympics, maybe people willing to drive for
half an hour at 1.30am could use Bath instead.

Places West of Westbury are served by later trains running via Bristol

The 20.35 is listed as the last train to Plymouth, the last to Taunton
and
Exeter is 21.45 (I'm ignoring the sleeper).

Why? What wrong with the sleeper?

Because there are a very limited number of sleeper routes (and sleeper
capacity), and so you can't rely on a sleeper train to mop up all the late
stragglers from the Olympics. You need other trains too.

I was speaking generally. The (seated portion of the) sleeper train has
been the last train of the day to Bath/Bristol and points west for 30 years.

You can't discount it when working out the last train to those destinations.

I accept that it won't be useful for the Olympics, but I thought we had got
beyond that discussion.

tim