Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() 1) South Sweden - The system assumes the minimum journey length unless the user manually sets a longer journey at the start. If starting on a bus then you have to tell the driver to do this, but if starting on a train you do this at the automatic machines. You are now on trust not to go outside the selected zones upon pain of fine if caught (just like LT really). This is definitely the same basic technology as London. 2) Helsinki - The same except that as there are only three zones the user can also select outer zones at the machine. This is a proximity card, but I don't know who supplies it. Thank you. These systems all seem to involve no "touch out" at all. So I would predict a massive increase in fare evasion if introduced here. Londoners are not Scandinavians. (And I still remember well what it used to be like on the NLL before it became gated. On the rare mornings they were checking for tickets roughly 1 in 5 turned round and walked away.) -- Robin PM may be sent to rbw0{at}hotmail{dot}com |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Oyster incomplete journeys research published | London Transport | |||
Oyster pre-pay penalty for incomplete journeys at NR terminals | London Transport | |||
No cap applied to Oyster prepay with incomplete journeys? | London Transport | |||
No cap applied to Oyster prepay with incomplete journeys? | London Transport | |||
No cap applied to Oyster prepay with incomplete journeys? | London Transport |