"Michael Bell" wrote in message
. uk
In message
Michael Bell wrote:

There is an interesting article about heat (as experienced by
passengers) in the Tube in this week's New Scientist.


Michael Bell

The problem with on-train refrigeration is that it dumps the heat into
the tunnel, which get back into the train which....

A work-round discussed in this article is for on-train refrigeration
to make ice while the train is on the surface and allow it to melt
while in the tunnel. But not all routes have surface sections.

A truly radical idea might be to pipe on board at the terminus liquid
air (no need to separate it into oxygen and nitrogen) and evaporate it
in the tunnel. Disposal of the waste is not a problem!

Apart from the last idea, I think these are quite old, superseded
proposals. As I understand it now, the current active proposals a
1. Improve ventilation of deep Tube stations, to extract heat from the
system (already happening)
2. Fit airconditioning to new lightweight articulated Tube stocks which
have regen brakes and will produce less heat from their motors (hoped
for in the proposed replacement for 1972, 73 and 92 stocks).

One other idea was to use cool ground water being pumped out from
tunnels to cool the tunnel air mass, but I think this proved too
expensive.

On 06/08/2011 08:41, Recliner wrote:
"Michael wrote in message
. uk
In . co.uk
Michael wrote:

There is an interesting article about heat (as experienced by
passengers) in the Tube in this week's New Scientist.


Michael Bell

The problem with on-train refrigeration is that it dumps the heat into
the tunnel, which get back into the train which....

A work-round discussed in this article is for on-train refrigeration
to make ice while the train is on the surface and allow it to melt
while in the tunnel. But not all routes have surface sections.

A truly radical idea might be to pipe on board at the terminus liquid
air (no need to separate it into oxygen and nitrogen) and evaporate it
in the tunnel. Disposal of the waste is not a problem!

Apart from the last idea, I think these are quite old, superseded
proposals. As I understand it now, the current active proposals a
1. Improve ventilation of deep Tube stations, to extract heat from the
system (already happening)
2. Fit airconditioning to new lightweight articulated Tube stocks which
have regen brakes and will produce less heat from their motors (hoped
for in the proposed replacement for 1972, 73 and 92 stocks).


About what articulated Tube stock do you speak?

wrote in message

On 06/08/2011 08:41, Recliner wrote:
"Michael wrote in message
. uk
In . co.uk
Michael wrote:

There is an interesting article about heat (as experienced by
passengers) in the Tube in this week's New Scientist.


Michael Bell

The problem with on-train refrigeration is that it dumps the heat
into the tunnel, which get back into the train which....

A work-round discussed in this article is for on-train refrigeration
to make ice while the train is on the surface and allow it to melt
while in the tunnel. But not all routes have surface sections.

A truly radical idea might be to pipe on board at the terminus
liquid air (no need to separate it into oxygen and nitrogen) and
evaporate it in the tunnel. Disposal of the waste is not a problem!

Apart from the last idea, I think these are quite old, superseded
proposals. As I understand it now, the current active proposals a
1. Improve ventilation of deep Tube stations, to extract heat from
the system (already happening)
2. Fit airconditioning to new lightweight articulated Tube stocks
which have regen brakes and will produce less heat from their motors
(hoped for in the proposed replacement for 1972, 73 and 92 stocks).


About what articulated Tube stock do you speak?

There's an LU proposal to resurrect some of the ideas from the abortive
Space train, which was derailed by Gordon Brown's PPP scheme which has
thankfully now collapsed. I understand that the usual manufacturers are
being asked for preliminary outline proposals, and the Siemens version
has appeared in the rail magazines. The articulated trains would have
open gangways (giving more passenger space), a smaller number of bogies
and light monocoque bodies to save weight. This would reduce power
consumption, allowing air-conditioning to be fitted.

It would be another large order, like the S stock, to replace the
existing trains on several lines (at least four), so it's worth some R&D
to come up with something creative (unlike the strictly conventional
PPP-originated 2009 and S stocks). Like the S stock and the 1938-1962
Tube stocks, this would run on several lines.

wrote in message
...

2. Fit airconditioning to new lightweight articulated Tube stocks which
have regen brakes and will produce less heat from their motors (hoped
for in the proposed replacement for 1972, 73 and 92 stocks).

About what articulated Tube stock do you speak?

Tfl's 'EVO' proposal for future tube stock, which is out with manufacturers
to get ideas for a prototype. Siemens version of it has reached the stage
of a scale model and has been displayed it at various exhibitions.

There's a page or so about it here, and IIRC it was mentioned in TfL's
underground board papers some time back:

http://www.rail.co/2011/02/06/revolution-on-the-tube/

I'm pretty sure it has been discussed in these newsgroups a few times
already.

Paul S

In article ,
(Paul Scott) wrote:

wrote in message
...

2. Fit airconditioning to new lightweight articulated Tube stocks which
have regen brakes and will produce less heat from their motors (hoped
for in the proposed replacement for 1972, 73 and 92 stocks).

About what articulated Tube stock do you speak?

Tfl's 'EVO' proposal for future tube stock, which is out with
manufacturers to get ideas for a prototype. Siemens version of it has
reached the stage of a scale model and has been displayed it at various
exhibitions.

There's a page or so about it here, and IIRC it was mentioned in
TfL's underground board papers some time back:

http://www.rail.co/2011/02/06/revolution-on-the-tube/

I'm pretty sure it has been discussed in these newsgroups a few times
already.

A generally good article, let down by not understanding the difference
between 2009 and S stock.

--
Colin Rosenstiel

In article ,
(Paul Corfield) wrote:

On Sat, 06 Aug 2011 07:32:47 -0500, wrote:

In article ,
(Paul Scott) wrote:

There's a page or so about it here, and IIRC it was mentioned in
TfL's underground board papers some time back:

http://www.rail.co/2011/02/06/revolution-on-the-tube/

I'm pretty sure it has been discussed in these newsgroups a few times
already.

A generally good article, let down by not understanding the difference
between 2009 and S stock.

I am probably wrong but I thought that Distance to Go signalling on
the Victoria Line was also, in effect, moving block. The article
suggests it is fixed block signalling which I don't think is really
correct.

Oh! That's a more serious limitation then. It implies it uses shorter but
still fixed blocks.

--
Colin Rosenstiel

On 06/08/2011 11:02, Paul Scott wrote:


wrote in message
...

2. Fit airconditioning to new lightweight articulated Tube stocks which
have regen brakes and will produce less heat from their motors (hoped
for in the proposed replacement for 1972, 73 and 92 stocks).

About what articulated Tube stock do you speak?

Tfl's 'EVO' proposal for future tube stock, which is out with manufacturers
to get ideas for a prototype. Siemens version of it has reached the stage
of a scale model and has been displayed it at various exhibitions.

There's a page or so about it here, and IIRC it was mentioned in TfL's
underground board papers some time back:

http://www.rail.co/2011/02/06/revolution-on-the-tube/

I'm pretty sure it has been discussed in these newsgroups a few times
already.

Paul S

It may well have been. Nice EVO picture.

On Sat, 6 Aug 2011, Paul Scott wrote:

wrote in message
...

2. Fit airconditioning to new lightweight articulated Tube stocks which
have regen brakes and will produce less heat from their motors (hoped
for in the proposed replacement for 1972, 73 and 92 stocks).

About what articulated Tube stock do you speak?

Tfl's 'EVO' proposal for future tube stock, which is out with manufacturers
to get ideas for a prototype. Siemens version of it has reached the stage
of a scale model and has been displayed it at various exhibitions.

There's a page or so about it here, and IIRC it was mentioned in TfL's
underground board papers some time back:

http://www.rail.co/2011/02/06/revolution-on-the-tube/

I'm pretty sure it has been discussed in these newsgroups a few times
already.

Not on utl, AFAIR. So thanks for the information!

tom

--
How's it going to end?