On Sep 2, 8:51*pm, Paul Corfield wrote:
On Fri, 2 Sep 2011 18:21:56 +0100, "Tim Fenton"

wrote:

"The Real Doctor" wrote in message
...
On 31/08/11 11:31, 1506 wrote:
Some of us choose to vote Conservative, no one causes us to do so.

But you live in California, don't you?

Adrian Hudson AFAIK lives in Nevada when he's at home.

In last year's Senate race, he backed Sharron Angle, who had the benefit of
being seriously bat**** mad. That she lost is something Adrian has had
considerable difficulty accepting.

It'll therefore be interesting to see which member of the "Tea and
Fruitcake" tendency he'll be supporting for 2012. *There's *such* an
excellent (and frighteningly bizarre) choice of candidates.

It's come to something, hasn't it, when the least wacko candidate the
Republican Party has identified to date is an adherent to a religion
involving some bloke apprently finding gold plates, translating them,
and then conveniently losing the plates.

In article ,
(Graeme Wall) wrote:

On 05/09/2011 08:51, 1506 wrote:
On Sep 4, 11:06 pm, Charles wrote:
On Sun, 4 Sep 2011 12:07:01 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

On Sep 4, 4:27 am, wrote:
In article
,

(1506) wrote:
The accepted definitionn of a Jewish person is that he, or she, is
the child of a Jewess, no ifs, ands, or buts.

Maybe not by your definition but plenty of Jews do not have Jewish
mothers.

NOT my definition, the rabbinical position since the Crusades.

A comparatively new idea then...

And one not universally accepted as I pointed out. My daughters have a
Jewish surname and the (fortunately small amount of) anti-semitism that goes
with it.

--
Colin Rosenstiel