Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Anyone her want to comment on this at all;'?... I can't make up my mind whether some of these problems stem from the person in the ticket office, the local manager or the TOC. * Experience with a range for FGW offices tends to suggest a localised problem rather than the TOC because I've had some (one in particular) refuse to sell valid combinations where others might grumble at the amount of work but do as requested. * The one that refuses to sell certain things has been doing it since Thames Trains days and the staff in the office haven't changed much so I'm guessing it's totally localised. * I did complain on one occasion and things improved for a while but a recent incident shows they are back to their old, bad, ways again. In this case the person acted rather oddly towards me when I explained what I wanted (using the same language I had on previous successful occasions). Part of the problem was that he "explained" to me why it was impossible to get a ticket to do what I wanted on a number of obviously incorrect bases. Since previous ticket sellers have sold me tickets that they thought would work, and since he was obviously reasoning incorrectly, I wasn't immediately convinced. He also began by saying he "didn't know" but only became categorical later. For example: he explained that if I bought a ticket via Cambridge that would be using FGW trains and the money would go "into their pot" whereas a ticket via Tottenham Hale would be a different train company. As a result I couldn't buy a ticket that went over both. This was so breathtakingly wrong I didn't really know how to react - I mean pretty much anyone who travels at all by trains knows you can get tickets that use more than one company, eg (I hadn't realised this at the time) FP = Shelford via Cambridge. He implied that I could have a ticket and risk what National Express would say (i.e. whether they would accept it) and didn't seem to think it was his job to help me find a suitable ticket. He was quite cross with me by the end. I asked for a complaint form and that made him crosser. He called me back and asked me how I needed a complaint and then harangued me a bit. Eventually I had to break it off and go. Really good not customer service. Thanks for the help. I tried reading the routing guide for the first time last night. Hmmmm. Its not the easiest work to absorb and I'm not sure how the underground fits in. I wish there was someone you could ask (I thought this was the train staff). Francis -- Tony Sayer |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 29, 9:12*pm, tony sayer wrote:
Anyone her want to comment on this at all;'?... I can't make up my mind whether some of these problems stem from the person in the ticket office, the local manager or the TOC. * Experience with a range for FGW offices tends to suggest a localised problem rather than the TOC because I've had some (one in particular) refuse to sell valid combinations where others might grumble at the amount of work but do as requested. * The one that refuses to sell certain things has been doing it since Thames Trains days and the staff in the office haven't changed much so I'm guessing it's totally localised. * I did complain on one occasion and things improved for a while but a recent incident shows they are back to their old, bad, ways again. In this case the person acted rather oddly towards me when I explained what I wanted (using the same language I had on previous successful occasions). Part of the problem was that he "explained" to me why it was impossible to get a ticket to do what I wanted on a number of obviously incorrect bases. Since previous ticket sellers have sold me tickets that they thought would work, and since he was obviously reasoning incorrectly, I wasn't immediately convinced. He also began by saying he "didn't know" but only became categorical later. For example: he explained that if I bought a ticket via Cambridge that would be using FGW trains and the money would go "into their pot" whereas a ticket via Tottenham Hale would be a different train company. As a result I couldn't buy a ticket that went over both. This was so breathtakingly wrong I didn't really know how to react - I mean pretty much anyone who travels at all by trains knows you can get tickets that use more than one company, eg (I hadn't realised this at the time) FP = Shelford via Cambridge. He implied that I could have a ticket and risk what National Express would say (i.e. whether they would accept it) and didn't seem to think it was his job to help me find a suitable ticket. He was quite cross with me by the end. I asked for a complaint form and that made him crosser. He called me back and asked me how I needed a complaint and then harangued me a bit. Eventually I had to break it off and go. Really good not customer service. Thanks for the help. I tried reading the routing guide for the first time last night. Hmmmm. Its not the easiest work to absorb and I'm not sure how the underground fits in. I wish there was someone you could ask (I thought this was the train staff). Francis -- Tony Sayer It's not clear at which station the OP is trying to buy a ticket but I guess, from the references to FGW, that it must be an FGW ticket office. Looking at my out-of-date Avatix program, there are two fares listed: Not London (ie via CBG) and +Any Permitted. The + symbol, of course, allows cross-London transfer by Underground appropriate to the journey being made, so AFAICT travelling via Tottenham Hale and the Victoria Line is permitted. Whoever the ticket seller is, though, he comes across as being either incompetent or plain contemptuous of his customers and if I were the OP, I would write a strongly-worded letter to the individual's employer describing what happened. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"The Gardener" wrote in message
... It's not clear at which station the OP is trying to buy a ticket but I guess, from the references to FGW, that it must be an FGW ticket office. It's quite clearly Finsbury Park if reading the original post in uk.t.l The reference to FGW is an error... Paul S |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 1, 1:57*pm, "Paul Scott"
wrote: "The Gardener" wrote in message ... It's not clear at which station the OP is trying to buy a ticket but I guess, from the references to FGW, that it must be an FGW ticket office. It's quite clearly Finsbury Park if reading the original post in uk.t.l The reference to FGW is an error... It is. Mea culpa. Francis |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 01/10/2011 13:57, Paul Scott wrote:
"The Gardener" wrote in message ... It's not clear at which station the OP is trying to buy a ticket but I guess, from the references to FGW, that it must be an FGW ticket office. It's quite clearly Finsbury Park if reading the original post in uk.t.l The reference to FGW is an error... Paul S Possibly he meant First Capital Connect, which is hardly fair on FGW. -- Moving things in still pictures |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 30, 9:11*pm, The Gardener wrote:
It's not clear at which station the OP is trying to buy a ticket but I guess, from the references to FGW, that it must be an FGW ticket office. Looking at my out-of-date Avatix program, there are two fares listed: Not London (ie via CBG) and +Any Permitted. The + symbol, of course, allows cross-London transfer by Underground appropriate to the journey being made, so AFAICT travelling via Tottenham Hale and the Victoria Line is permitted. What I wasn't sure about is if + allows you to start (or end) at an underground station. Ie. for the last leg of the journey to be made by underground (at least in theory - of course I'd probably just use my oyster for this bit). How does one deduce that the Victoria Line is "permitted"? Am I right in thinking that because there's a ticket via CBG it must be "Any Permitted"? Whoever the ticket seller is, though, he comes across as being either incompetent or plain contemptuous of his customers and if I were the OP, I would write a strongly-worded letter to the individual's employer describing what happened. I may well do that if I can summon up the energy. I have their name - I forgot to get it so my wife went back and asked the other guy (to avoid further conflict). He told her "its written on his name badge" but was eventually persuaded to give the guy's name which was much shorter. My wife deals a lot with customer service employees so she was deeply unimpressed by it. Thanks for all this useful information. At some point I might brave trying to buy a ticket that does the job. I have a new part-time job that may mean I go to Shelford a few times a month by train, so this is all potentially very useful. Sometimes those journeys might have to be via a break in Cambridge, but that's just me being awkward :-). Francis |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message
, at 15:40:42 on Sat, 1 Oct 2011, Francis Davey remarked: What I wasn't sure about is if + allows you to start (or end) at an underground station. Ie. for the last leg of the journey to be made by underground (at least in theory - of course I'd probably just use my oyster for this bit). How does one deduce that the Victoria Line is "permitted"? This was explained in the old "Part A" of the Fares Manual, not to be confused with Section A of the Routing Guide! http://www.atoc.org/about-atoc/rail-...routeing-guide The old Part A is also not supplied with the CD-ROM "Avantix Traveller" available for a tenner from HMSO. I've not found any evidence that it's online at all at the moment, but presumably ticket sellers have access to it in some form. The friendliest ticket seller I found was the one at Meldreth station (but be quick, there are plans to turn it, and many similar, into unmanned stations). Anyway, here's an extract from Part A of Jan 2008 (NFM98 for the geeks) which was the last published in that form online, afaict. "Ticket prices in Section C, for journeys routed for travel ’via London’ and marked with the symbol + include the cost of transfer across London by London Underground, DLR or First Capital Connect train services on the Thameslink route. Tickets displaying the ’cross-London’ marker â€*, are valid for travel between any two of the following stations appropriate to the route of the through rail journey being made. Aldgate Finsbury Park Queens Park Amersham Greenwich Richmond Baker Street Highbury & Islington Seven Sisters Balham Kensington Olympia Southwark Bank Kentish Town Stratford Barking King’s Cross/St Tottenham Hale Pancras Blackfriars Lancaster Gate Tower Hill Blackhorse Road Lewisham Upminster Cannon Street Limehouse Vauxhall Charing Cross Liverpool Street Victoria Ealing Broadway London Bridge Walthamstow Ctl Edgware Road Marylebone Waterloo Elephant & Castle Moorgate West Brompton Embankment New Cross Gate West Ham Euston Old Street West Hampstead Euston Square Paddington Wimbledon Farringdon Am I right in thinking that because there's a ticket via CBG it must be "Any Permitted"? There are two options from Finsbury Park to Cambridge: +London[1] and Not-London. Any Permitted just means you can use either/both. The "Not London" is also sold separately, of course. [1] Where the + means "including underground transfers. -- Roland Perry |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
We were about to embark at Dover, when (Roland Perry)
came up to me and whispered: There are two options from Finsbury Park to Cambridge: +London[1] and Not-London. You could always use the CLive Feather Discount, and buy a ticket from Finsbury Park to London Stations... -- Paul Cummins - Always a NetHead Wasting Bandwidth since 1981 ---- If it's below this line, I didn't write it ---- |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , at
11:27:00 on Sun, 2 Oct 2011, Paul Cummins remarked: There are two options from Finsbury Park to Cambridge: +London[1] and Not-London. You could always use the CLive Feather Discount, and buy a ticket from Finsbury Park to London Stations... That was an alleged bug in the v1.0 routing guide. Today's routing guide says the only map to use for such a ticket is EE (initially I suppose it may have said WA[1]), which reveals just two mapped routes (which are also direct trains, so the map isn't adding anything) to Kings Cross and Moorgate. [1] You can understand how that might have happened, WA is in other respects a much more logical map to choose than what's in effect "secondary ways to get from London to the North East". -- Roland Perry |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Slow train Bowes Park to Finsbury Park | London Transport | |||
Ticket gates at Finsbury Park | London Transport | |||
Finsbury Park cycle park ready | London Transport News | |||
Finsbury park mysery tunnel | London Transport | |||
Oyster at Finsbury Park | London Transport |