Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 5, 11:16*am, BumYoghurt
wrote: First time lurker, first time poster. Just a bit furious as to why they won't extend the London Overground to Streatham- especially when no new track needs to be built. Crystal Palace to Clapham Junction would join up Balham, Wandsworth and Streatham Hill/Common and all would be well with the world. Thoughts? -- BumYoghurt There was once a plan to link the East London Railway (as was) with the Lea Valley Line somewhere between Bethnal Green and Cambridge Heath. Also it would have been nice if there were platforms reinstated on the mainline (maybe Lea Valley tracks only) almost directly beneath Shoreditch High Street, as the ELL has no interchange with the Central line or with National Express. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dr. Sunil" wrote in message
... Also it would have been nice if there were platforms reinstated on the mainline (maybe Lea Valley tracks only) almost directly beneath Shoreditch High Street, as the ELL has no interchange with the Central line or with National Express. The lack of a Central Line interchange was intentional, it was decided early on that an interchange with Crossrail at Whitechapel would be better for distributing passengers more evenly. Paul S |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 6 Oct 2011 11:16:09 +0100
"Paul Scott" wrote: "Dr. Sunil" wrote in message ... Also it would have been nice if there were platforms reinstated on the mainline (maybe Lea Valley tracks only) almost directly beneath Shoreditch High Street, as the ELL has no interchange with the Central line or with National Express. The lack of a Central Line interchange was intentional, it was decided early on that an interchange with Crossrail at Whitechapel would be better for distributing passengers more evenly. Ie making their life easier instead of doing something for the benefit of the passengers. Yup, that sounds about right. B2003 |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 06 Oct 2011 15:00:17 +0100
Basil Jet wrote: How is opening an extra station on one of the most crowded parts of the network a good idea? They made passive provision for a Central Line station, that was the right thing to do. Yes , good point. And taking that further - Oxford Street is very crowded so lets get rid of the central line interchange there and make everyone walk from Bond Street. Sorted. B2003 |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Paul Scott wrote:
The lack of a Central Line interchange was intentional, it was decided early on that an interchange with Crossrail at Whitechapel would be better for distributing passengers more evenly. Isn't Shoreditch High Street positioned so that an interchange could be built if future generations deem it necessary and possible? |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Tim Roll-Pickering" wrote in message
... Paul Scott wrote: The lack of a Central Line interchange was intentional, it was decided early on that an interchange with Crossrail at Whitechapel would be better for distributing passengers more evenly. Isn't Shoreditch High Street positioned so that an interchange could be built if future generations deem it necessary and possible? That's definitely been mentioned, because they expect significantly altered loadings on the Central after Crossrail opens. Paul |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Overground expansion | London Transport | |||
London Overground expansion | London Transport | |||
London Overground expansion | London Transport | |||
Congestion charging expansion plans: zone expansion. | London Transport |