Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 10:41:35 on Tue, 11 Oct 2011, Bruce remarked: The proposal for a second runway is a little over 1km to the south of the existing one, with the new (third) terminal between the runways. There is no proposal for a second runway. Legally, there can be no such proposal until 2019. There has been a proposal since at least 2005 (I've been quoting from the BAA documents). No doubt the new owners considered such proposals before buying - it would be an insane leap in the dark not to. What they can't do is *start building* until 2019. I originally thought they couldn't apply for planning permission until 2019, but it's not even that. That is what I thought too. I researched it in some detail in the 1990s as I lived in an area of Sussex that already had quite a lot of aircraft noise and would have had more if the changes had gone ahead. It was quite clear at that time that a second runway could not even be considered before 2019. I wonder when that changed, because a lot was written and said about it at the time to reassure people who were concerned that they might be affected. I'm not sure exactly what is the status of the current government review of airport capacity in the south east, but I fear that it will be the usual superficial, short term study that politicians adore. What we really need is a Royal Commission. The last one we had produced the Roskill report. Its recommendation for a new airport at Cublington, near Aylesbury was not accepted and the Tory government of the day (1971) chose Maplin Sands (Foulness), which was later rejected in favour of developing Stansted. However the wealth of high quality objective research that was commissioned for the report has informed airport policy ever since. It is that kind of depth and breadth of research that is needed now, and unfortunately it looks like we aren't going to get it. Instead, far reaching decisions are likely to be made on a short term whim, and HS2 has shown how a thoroughly daft idea can gain the most enormous political momentum, all for the wrong reasons. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
PAYG now live on SE Highspeed twixt St Pancras and Stratford | London Transport | |||
Decision on Croxley Rail Link due 'in next two weeks' | London Transport | |||
Thameslink up the spout again - sig problem twixt Cricklewood and Radlett | London Transport | |||
"Heathrow and Gatwick airports: Ministers mull rail link" (twixt | London Transport | |||
Oyster PAYG twixt Viccy and Balham | London Transport |