Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#25
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 11/10/2011 15:06, Bruce wrote:
At that time, the scheme that had previously been proposed for the second runway had a separation from the existing runway of nowhere near 1.0 km, so it is obvious that there has been at least one significant change. The previous proposal kept to a minimum the amount of demolition that would be needed. I think it was limited to part or all of one industrial estate. I would imagine that a 1.0 km separation would involve much more demolition as the new runway would be significantly closer to Crawley. The noise nuisance would also be worse. Maybe someone is waiting for a proposal involving demolishing all of Crawley... -- Arthur Figgis Surrey, UK |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
PAYG now live on SE Highspeed twixt St Pancras and Stratford | London Transport | |||
Decision on Croxley Rail Link due 'in next two weeks' | London Transport | |||
Thameslink up the spout again - sig problem twixt Cricklewood and Radlett | London Transport | |||
"Heathrow and Gatwick airports: Ministers mull rail link" (twixt | London Transport | |||
Oyster PAYG twixt Viccy and Balham | London Transport |