Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Do the platforms at Baker St. which are used by Met trains heading to/
from Aldgate ever get used for trains which terminate at Baker St.? Are all the Met platforms at Baker St. used fairly intensively or is there capacity for a train to be stabled out of use when defective or as a stand-by? Do trains stick to Aldgate or "non-Aldgate" services for most of the day or do they interwork between the two? What determines which diagrams will be allocated "A Stock" and which "S Stock"? Does the Chesham branch work better as a "through" service or should it have been left as a shuttle? -- gordon |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ... Do the platforms at Baker St. which are used by Met trains heading to/ from Aldgate ever get used for trains which terminate at Baker St.? Are all the Met platforms at Baker St. used fairly intensively or is there capacity for a train to be stabled out of use when defective or as a stand-by? Do trains stick to Aldgate or "non-Aldgate" services for most of the day or do they interwork between the two? What determines which diagrams will be allocated "A Stock" and which "S Stock"? Does the Chesham branch work better as a "through" service or should it have been left as a shuttle? -- gordon When the Aldgate service was peak hours only in T stock days the through platforms were certainly used for the off peak terrminators.The station could not have coped otherwise. Don Davis |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Not sure of the exact proportion, or where from, but yes several Met
services every hour terminate at Baker Street - it may be close to a third. Incidentally, those that continue to the city, certainly in the peak, do not always get as far as Aldgate some terminate at Moorgate as well. The Met is also unusual in that, unlike other lines, there is a concept of fast and slow trains the longer distant Met services being non-stop over certain sections. That's maybe where the different types of stock come in useful. My observations at Aldgate, last I was there, showed the full set of Met destinations being served so presumably it's a proportion of each service that terminates at Baker Street. I always find Baker St to be a bit of a pain, changing and traveling onwards eastbound, trying to second guess which platform is going to have the next service. I just follow the crowd which seems to work. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ... Do the platforms at Baker St. which are used by Met trains heading to/ from Aldgate ever get used for trains which terminate at Baker St.? Are all the Met platforms at Baker St. used fairly intensively or is there capacity for a train to be stabled out of use when defective or as a stand-by? Do trains stick to Aldgate or "non-Aldgate" services for most of the day or do they interwork between the two? What determines which diagrams will be allocated "A Stock" and which "S Stock"? Does the Chesham branch work better as a "through" service or should it have been left as a shuttle? -- gordon The all-day through services to/from Chesham haven't made a big difference. Four cars were sufficient and the change at Chalfont isn't (wasn't!) complicated. One unfortunate outcome might be that it may now be more difficult to make a refund claim! It is ironic that a passenger survey was held over the "proposed" changeover from the shuttle to through services when, once the decision to acquire the S stock had been made, the decision was surely a fait acconpli. PA |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Four cars were sufficient and the change at Chalfont isn't (wasn't!) complicated. * You could probably have made the same argument for the through trains to Amersham by the time they had emptied out along the way. Presumably, Chesham is as big a target as Amersham so the split service makes sense to me if it really is going where enough of the PAX wan't to go. I always hate otherwise and the concept so often found in the sate - the idea that operating convenience should be allowed to trump what the customer's actually want, often for no very good reason. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"allantracy" wrote in message
... Not sure of the exact proportion, or where from, but yes several Met services every hour terminate at Baker Street - it may be close to a third. But I think the question was whether or not any trains terminate in the through roads, rather than in the bays. I suspect the through roads can be used, but it only happens when there are problems, or planned closures beyond Baker St. Paul S |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 15, 5:07*pm, allantracy wrote:
Not sure of the exact proportion, or where from, but yes several Met services every hour terminate at Baker Street - it may be close to a third. Sure, but I'm presuming that they terminate in the dead-end platforms. What I'm wondering is whether the two "through" platforms *can* be used for terminating trains (e.g. if services were temporarily suspended between Baker St. and Aldgate). I always find Baker St to be a bit of a pain, changing and traveling onwards eastbound, trying to second guess which platform is going to have the next service. Agreed. Paddington can also be a bit irksome. If you're not heading to/ from the mainline station but travelling from say King's Cross you've the option of changing trains at Edgware Road and getting a convenient exit at Pad or travelling on a through train which decants you at the back of beyond in the main station. -- gordon |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 15, 7:21*pm, " wrote:
On Oct 15, 5:07*pm, allantracy wrote: Not sure of the exact proportion, or where from, but yes several Met services every hour terminate at Baker Street - it may be close to a third. Sure, but I'm presuming that they terminate in the dead-end platforms. What I'm wondering is whether the two "through" platforms *can* be used for terminating trains (e.g. if services were temporarily suspended between Baker St. and Aldgate). Yes, seen that done, it may still happen when the service thins out in the evening hours. However, during the normal daytime timetable the through platforms can't be left occupied long enough for a terminating train and the bays are used instead. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 15, 5:54*pm, allantracy wrote:
Presumably, Chesham is as big a target as Amersham so the split service makes sense to me if it really is going where enough of the PAX wan't to go. True. I just wondered whether there had been any perceived diminution of reliability by Cheshamites used to a self-contained yo-yo-like operation not subject to the potential for delay which would be more prone to afflict the odd "through" journey and where the frequency is low enough to make reference to a timetable a more likely thing than many other parts of the LU network. -- gordon |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Paul Corfield" wrote in message
... The last I read there were 10 S Stocks available for daily use on the Met. One of the early units has been temporarily converted to a S7 for testing purposes - it was out and about last weekend between Barking and Aldgate East. The latest on District Dave is that from next week the S8s will be randomly used on any Met service, because they can go anywhere, and enough of the drivers are fully trained. Paul S |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
What was this in Baker Street? | London Transport | |||
Help- access to Jubilee line at Baker St | London Transport | |||
Strange operations at Edgware Road tonight | London Transport | |||
'Structrual damage' at Baker Street AM Friday 11th Feb | London Transport | |||
Baker St. Bakerloo and Jubilee | London Transport |