Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Paul wrote on 24 October 2011 19:11:21 ...
On Oct 24, 6:01 pm, Paul wrote: On Mon, 24 Oct 2011 01:19:15 -0700 (PDT), wrote: Just came across this on BBC News http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-15422882 The only "fully remote" metro I have used is the VAL system in Lille, and the trains there are far too small to be able to cope with the crowds in London. "Fully remote" operation would require platform edge doors at every station, and I would be very surprised if that could be achieved in 9 years, given current budget constraints. There are other examples of driverless automated metros. The North East line and recently completed Circle line in Singapore are fully automated and many trains run without any staff on board. The Singapore MRT is not exactly a backwater system and carries high volumes. I would expect the next MRT line - the Downtown Line - will also be fully automated and it will have a high level of patronage given its route. The stations are designed with platform edge doors to provide full segregation from the track. On the older MRT lines half height platform edge gates are being fitted at open air stations while underground stations have platform edge doors. I'm not sure how Hong Kong MTR is proceeding but the new South Island line will probably be fully automatic given it is physically separate from other MTR lines. I'd expect the MTR will make the move to full automation at some point when control system and rolling stock renewal permit it. Underground stations have had PEDs retrofitted while the few open air stations on the older lines don't yet have doors or gates at the platform edge. Newer lines have had PEDs from opening. I suspect there may also be other fully automated lines in Asia but I'm not sufficiently knowledgeable about those systems. -- Paul C I didn't realise the Singapore system was automated. I was there last year and used the MRT quite a bit. However, is it not much easier to build an automated system from scratch rather than convert an existing system? Yes, but converting an existing system is certainly not impossible. The RATP in Paris are doing just that with Métro line 1 at present, having installed platform-edge doors at all stations. Currently it works with ATO like the Central/Victoria/Jubilee lines in London. Note that Paris retrofitted ATO to most lines starting in the 1970s. Some of the converted 1959-vintage stock is still running. -- Richard J. (to email me, swap 'uk' and 'yon' in address) |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Crossrail and Tube upgrades spared the axe - NCE | London Transport | |||
Boris admits bendy-buses are safe - but he'll axe them anyway | London Transport | |||
Boris admits bendy-buses are safe - but he'll axe them anyway | London Transport | |||
Volvo FH12 500 6x4 Skogsbil / Timmerbil | London Transport | |||
GOBLIN ticket offices? | London Transport |