Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have a question that's been bugging me for some time. When you're
travelling northbound on the city branch of the Northern line, as you approach Angel, the train appears to pass diagonally across an enlarged section of tunnel (ie, an open space suddenly appears on one side and as the wall moves closer on approach to the station, the wall on the other side of the train seems to move away). Upon leaving the station, the same thing happens in reverse. Can anyone explain this? Also, judging by the size of the southbound platform, I'm assuming that this was where the original station was, and that the old northbound line was covered up by the platform. If this is so, do the original NB tunnels still exist behind the walls at the ends of the platform? Many thanks, Daniel. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Heliomass" wrote in message
... I have a question that's been bugging me for some time. When you're travelling northbound on the city branch of the Northern line, as you approach Angel, the train appears to pass diagonally across an enlarged section of tunnel (ie, an open space suddenly appears on one side and as the wall moves closer on approach to the station, the wall on the other side of the train seems to move away). Upon leaving the station, the same thing happens in reverse. Can anyone explain this? A new northbound platform was built, with short lengths of tunnel either side joining the new station tunnel to the original northbound tunnel. Because of the need to keep the service running whilst the diversion work was done, the junction tunnels were built outside the existing tunnel, which was later demolished and, ultimately, the track diverted. A similar diversion was done at London Bridge, where a new southbound platform was constructed, though in this case the northernmost junction was done differently due to the Thames being above (which also meant that the line had to be closed for several months). Here, part of the old tunnel was effectively filled in and the new tunnel bored from scratch, hence there is no large-diameter junction tunnel there, though the change in tunnel lining is obvious. Also, judging by the size of the southbound platform, I'm assuming that this was where the original station was, and that the old northbound line was covered up by the platform. Correct. The station had a narrow island platform, like those which still survive at Clapham Common and Clapham North. If this is so, do the original NB tunnels still exist behind the walls at the ends of the platform? Yes. They are accessible through doors in the headwalls at both ends of the (now) s/b platform. At the southern end of the station there used to be a siding (though which part of the n/b diversion tunnel runs), and the junction tunnel associated with that also still exists. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in message
... In article , (Heliomass) wrote: I have a question that's been bugging me for some time. When you're travelling northbound on the city branch of the Northern line, as you approach Angel, the train appears to pass diagonally across an enlarged section of tunnel (ie, an open space suddenly appears on one side and as the wall moves closer on approach to the station, the wall on the other side of the train seems to move away). Upon leaving the station, the same thing happens in reverse. Can anyone explain this? Also, judging by the size of the southbound platform, I'm assuming that this was where the original station was, and that the old northbound line was covered up by the platform. If this is so, do the original NB tunnels still exist behind the walls at the ends of the platform? Many thanks, Daniel. see: http://www.romilepa.pwp.blueyonder.c.../stepplate.JPG Originally posted to show a step-plate junction, this shows the basics of the NB approach to Angel. The platforms are directly to the right of the diagram. There was also a similar diversion made for the Euston City platform. Except that at Euston the original NB track (now known as the Euston loop)was retained to give access to the SB platform. At both Angel and Euston there was a siding off the platform to the right, situated between the NB and SB running rails. At both stations the siding was blocked off as the NB diversion passed through it at an angle. This is still visible from the crossover when departing Euston SB. Roger Thanks guys, that answers my questions! Daniel. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
When was there a siding at Angel? The present siding at Euston, which
connects the SB line with the NB and the loop to the Piccadilly line, was originally the NB line. As far as I know there was previously no siding at either location. -- Lawrence Myers wrote in message ... In article , (Heliomass) wrote: I have a question that's been bugging me for some time. When you're travelling northbound on the city branch of the Northern line, as you approach Angel, the train appears to pass diagonally across an enlarged section of tunnel (ie, an open space suddenly appears on one side and as the wall moves closer on approach to the station, the wall on the other side of the train seems to move away). Upon leaving the station, the same thing happens in reverse. Can anyone explain this? Also, judging by the size of the southbound platform, I'm assuming that this was where the original station was, and that the old northbound line was covered up by the platform. If this is so, do the original NB tunnels still exist behind the walls at the ends of the platform? Many thanks, Daniel. see: http://www.romilepa.pwp.blueyonder.c.../stepplate.JPG Originally posted to show a step-plate junction, this shows the basics of the NB approach to Angel. The platforms are directly to the right of the diagram. There was also a similar diversion made for the Euston City platform. Except that at Euston the original NB track (now known as the Euston loop)was retained to give access to the SB platform. At both Angel and Euston there was a siding off the platform to the right, situated between the NB and SB running rails. At both stations the siding was blocked off as the NB diversion passed through it at an angle. This is still visible from the crossover when departing Euston SB. Roger |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Lawrence Myers" wrote in message
... When was there a siding at Angel? Full details on http://members.lycos.co.uk/raggajohn/northerndis.html. The present siding at Euston, which connects the SB line with the NB and the loop to the Piccadilly line, was originally the NB line. As far as I know there was previously no siding at either location. Definitely sidings at both Angel and Euston. In both cases on the northbound side, south of the station concerned. The disused tunnel can clearly be seen at Euston, but only from trains travelling over the Euston Loop. The one at Angel now forms part of the northbound diversion tunnel, and all northbound trains travel through a section of it. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Lawrence Myers
writes When was there a siding at Angel? Built in 1901 when the CSLR was extended to Islington. There was another at Old Street (both long enough to hold an entire train). The present siding at Euston, which connects the SB line with the NB and the loop to the Piccadilly line, was originally the NB line. As far as I know there was previously no siding at either location. The Euston siding was built in 1907, when Euston became the new terminus of the CSLR. (all are mentioned in LU / Capital Transport's little book on The Northern Line). -- Paul Terry |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Angel Lane, Stratford | London Transport | |||
Building at the old Angel station - what's going on? | London Transport | |||
Escalator at Angel | London Transport | |||
Old Angel Station | London Transport | |||
Siding at Angel and Euston | London Transport |