Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Roland Perry wrote: In message , at 21:07:24 on Thu, 1 Dec 2011, Nick Leverton remarked: any successful venture on the site would almost certainly be predicated on the construction of a tube line, which would cost hundreds of millions of pounds." Maybe it turned out that too much of that cost would be laid on the developer? I thought the tube line was to be financed by other Nine Elms area developments? I don't think there's much chance of a contribution from the new US Embassy :-( Boris was reported to be looking for £2.5m from the Embassy project, which is small change and neither here nor there in the grand scheme of things. On the other hand, the Battersea Power Station project is supposed to be grossing £5.5bn, which is almost 20x the loan they are currently floundering with. A lot of business ideas suppose that they can gross a lot of money, and a lot of them fail to meet their goals. Of more interest, if anyone knows, would be what contribution the project was actually expected to make to the Northern Line Battersea extension. Nick -- Serendipity: http://www.leverton.org/blosxom (last update 29th March 2010) "The Internet, a sort of ersatz counterfeit of real life" -- Janet Street-Porter, BBC2, 19th March 1996 |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Battersea extension | London Transport | |||
Battersea extension | London Transport | |||
Battersea Northern Line extension now done with a loan? | London Transport | |||
Northern Line Extension To Battersea | London Transport | |||
Buses - exhaust smoke and warming up | London Transport |