Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 20 Dez., 10:46, amogles wrote:
On 20 Dez., 09:57, "Graham Harrison" wrote: And, I am aware of the new double deck trams in Hong Kong. Alexandria also has some double-deck trams. I beleive they are of Chinese make. In the past, double deck trams were more common. Paris and Berlin both had them and no doubt several other cities besides. I am not sure about the details, but I believe that one factor that was different in the UK was legislation concerning trailers. I am not sure whether they were banend outright, or it was something else. Anyway, although some British trams did have trailers, they were extremely rare. Where the Germans for example used trailers to grow capacity, British operators built upwards. Of course one disadvantage of trailers was that they needed to be shunted at the at end of trip, and so loop tracks had to be provided. Many operators worked around this by building turning loops in which no shunting was required but the entire tram went around on a cicle of track to face the other direction. The provison of these prepared the way for the next development which was that of the uni-directional tram, having a cab at only one end and doors on only one side. They were less flexible in service as they needed loops but from the maintenance perspective there was less hardware to be maintained. The absence of doors on the off side also meant that more seats could be provided. From there they went to articulated trams which again was a step backwards in terms of flexibility (compared to trailers) but had advanatges in terms of passenger flow and better utilisation of space etc. Also the concept was scalable so longer and longer trams could be made just by adding intermediate segments. Anf here lies the advantage of modern trams. They have more capacity than buses and so if the traffic is there to justify it, they are moder efficient operationally. A double deck tram has by nature about the capacity of a double deck bus, so given the choice the operator opts for the bus which is more flexible and cheaper. But high-capacity trams which could take double the number of passengers as buses if not more meant that the closure of many German systems was simply not a feasible option. Of course many of the lesser and lighter lines did close, and the tram system we see in Germany today are in many cases just the skeletons of what once was. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Modern Railways, June | London Transport | |||
On the Top Deck | London Transport | |||
Modern trains and electronic equipment? | London Transport | |||
Modern DC EMUs | London Transport | |||
Double deck Crossrail | London Transport |