Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#481
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 25/02/2012 16:21, Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 15:48:40 on Sat, 25 Feb 2012, Graham Nye remarked: When using my UK credit card in the US I only needed to sign for some transactions. There's some over-simplification here. While I agree that some retailers (especially high-margin ones like restaurants) may not require a signature, there's a second floor limit above which they have to call the credit card company. That limit seems to me to be much lower than you'd get in the UK for a similar transaction verified by PIN. Having signed my CC bill in restaurants I was expecting a waiter to come back and at least pretend to check the signature. But no, you just sign and go, and they collect the CC slip when they clear the table. Perhaps I didn't need to sign the slip (but they had the usual pre-printed lines to sign along). [Gas stations.] There's some over-generalisation here, it depends where you are in the USA; some places need payment first, others don't. It depends a little on the local demographic. Clearly it must have been crooked! Well, it was the Wild West (Arizona). -- Graham Nye news(a)thenyes.org.uk |
#482
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 25/02/2012 16:25, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
The thing is that the merchant really wants to the driver to enter the store to buy food or coffee or cigarettes, which are very high markup items. The gas station owner probably wants that but the staff seemed to prefer me to pay up, fuel up and push off without darkening their doors, and certainly without interrupting their conversation. At times, merchants make nominal profits on gasoline. I don't know how fuel prices are set at retail in the UK... When the crude price goes up retail prices go up and when crude prices go down this happens - -. -- Graham Nye news(a)thenyes.org.uk |
#483
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Graeme Wall wrote
On 24/02/2012 21:20, Adam H. Kerman wrote: What credit card transaction requires a PIN? Those are strictly for debit card transactions. All UK transactions. Err, not quite all. A UK transaction with a foreign plastic card could be signature based and the banks have agreed to issue signature based cards to customers with disabilities who need them. Hence, I suppose, why a UK supermarket self-checkout has the text "PIN or Signature". -- Mike D |
#484
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roland Perry wrote:
at 16:40:17 on Sat, 25 Feb 2012, Adam H. Kerman remarked: No, UK credit cards also have a magnetic stripe on the back, so they can be swiped through a US retail terminal. You just have to sign on the transaction, rather than use your PIN. Only if, as above, the transaction is above the merchant's floor limit. When using my UK credit card in the US I only needed to sign for some transactions. There's some over-simplification here. While I agree that some retailers (especially high-margin ones like restaurants) may not require a signature, there's a second floor limit above which they have to call the credit card company. That limit seems to me to be much lower than you'd get in the UK for a similar transaction verified by PIN. Really? There's no concept of pre-authorizing the transaction, then charging the customer the approved charge in two separate steps, both performed at the retail terminal? No. I routinely spend amounts of the order of a thousand dollars at retailers by Chip and PIN card, and it's a one-shot process. If that's true, then I suspect your credit limit is stored on the card. In a typical transaction in the US, the customer or cashier swipes the card at the terminal (which one does it depends on the layout). Data is exchanged with the credit card processor's server. Data sent back to the merchant's terminal is the account credit limit (not disclosed to the cashier unless there is a situation with a high-value purchase like jewelry) and authorization code. The authorization code is critical, which is why merchants cooperate in pre-authorizing sales. If a merchant submits a transaction that wasn't pre-authorized and the bill isn't paid, the merchant's account is charged back. During authorization, there is a temporary freeze put on the cardholder's credit limit in some fixed block amount, such as rounding up to the next $100. This block must exceed the actual purchase amount. When the total sale is known and taxes calculated, this amount is sent to the credit card processor. The merchant then receives back a transaction ID number, which may be printed on the receipt. The cardholder sees this number on the monthly statement. The credit limit freeze stays on the cardholder's account till the sale has been posted to his account. This could happen immediately, but it may not happen until the merchant submits his accounts that night, and might be delayed a couple of days if more than one card processor is involved. Now, the authorization and transaction ID steps can occur closer together if the total sale amount is sent with the credit card account number, but the retailer receives the data back in two steps. It just depends how fully integrated the card terminal is into the cash register. Retail stores tend to have more sophisticated terminals than, say, restaurants do. At a restaurant, the food and drinks bill may be calculated on one system (or by hand in plenty of places), the cash register is not integrated into the food ordering system the kitchen sees if they aren't still going by hand-written tickets, and the card terminal is separate still. In that case, the cashier rings up the purchase, gets a total, swipes the credit card, waits to receive authorization, then enters the total again into the card terminal, then receives the transaction ID back which prints on the credit card slip the customer signs. Some restaurants can enter the total into the card terminal at the time the card is swiped, but they ask the customer to add the tip before entering the total. Fast food restaurants have extremely sophisticated and well integrated systems, using one system to take the order and relay the order to the kitchen and handle the sale, including the credit card transaction. In any of these setups, from the customer's perspective, the card is swiped just the one time (unless there is a failure to obtain authorization), but the authorization and transaction are two separate steps, perhaps with a noticeable delay between the two. Jewelry stores don't call the credit card processor or bank if nothing appears to be amiss. It's handled electronically. The mechanism is that their terminal asks them to call, if the transaction is flagged. Yeah, hoping and praying that they are dealing with mere con artists committing a burglary and that the situation won't deteriorate into a robbery. The occasional machine, e.g. at gas stations, wanted to know my home zip code (which, of course, I don't have) but I was able to pay in the kiosk. (US gas stations need payment before dispensing fuel, rather than afterwards, as in the UK.) There's some over-generalisation here, it depends where you are in the USA; some places need payment first, others don't. It depends a little on the local demographic. Actually, two gas stations at the same intersection can have different policies. So it also depends a little on the retailer's internal policy (and also their previous record for accepting fraudulent transactions, which might in turn depend on their staff training programme), but common sense tells us that already. It may depend on past history of theft, but as I commented on in the other message, it may depend more upon assuming that the driver is traveling a great distance and this won't be a repeat customer, with a hint of prejudice against strangers from out of town being more likely to be thieves than locals are. Of course some merchants assume everyone is a thief, no matter how regularly he shops there. |
#485
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 25/02/2012 16:27, Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 16:22:09 on Sat, 25 Feb 2012, " remarked: UK credit cards and proximity cards are different things. They are "converging things". I don't know of any post-payment proximity cards that aren't also conventional credit cards. But only a few conventional credit cards have the proximity technology. Barclays Bank, IIRC. |
#486
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 25-Feb-12 10:21, Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 15:48:40 on Sat, 25 Feb 2012, Graham Nye remarked: No, UK credit cards also have a magnetic stripe on the back, so they can be swiped through a US retail terminal. You just have to sign on the transaction, rather than use your PIN. Only if, as above, the transaction is above the merchant's floor limit. When using my UK credit card in the US I only needed to sign for some transactions. There's some over-simplification here. While I agree that some retailers (especially high-margin ones like restaurants) may not require a signature, there's a second floor limit above which they have to call the credit card company. That limit seems to me to be much lower than you'd get in the UK for a similar transaction verified by PIN. By "call the credit card company", do you mean actually speak with a human, or just do a standard automated authorization? The merchant's "floor" allows them to post transactions below a certain threshold without prior authorization. At least in the US, the floor is usually USD 25-50, though for some merchants it's $0 due to high chargeback rates. The occasional machine, e.g. at gas stations, wanted to know my home zip code (which, of course, I don't have) but I was able to pay in the kiosk. (US gas stations need payment before dispensing fuel, rather than afterwards, as in the UK.) There's some over-generalisation here, it depends where you are in the USA; some places need payment first, others don't. It depends a little on the local demographic. More specifically, it will depend on the drive-off (i.e. theft) rate at that location or in that neighborhood. S -- Stephen Sprunk "God does not play dice." --Albert Einstein CCIE #3723 "God is an inveterate gambler, and He throws the K5SSS dice at every possible opportunity." --Stephen Hawking |
#487
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 25 Feb 2012 09:15:20 +0000, Graeme Wall
wrote: On 25/02/2012 08:40, Charles Ellson wrote: On Sat, 25 Feb 2012 08:26:56 +0000, Graeme Wall wrote: On 24/02/2012 22:59, Charles Ellson wrote: On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 21:42:40 +0000, Graeme Wall wrote: On 24/02/2012 21:20, Adam H. Kerman wrote: What credit card transaction requires a PIN? Those are strictly for debit card transactions. All UK transactions. ... other than on-line (or contactless?). Not actually come across any contactless credit cards in the wild yet. I know they exist, just haven't come across any. Barclays. Both debit and credit cards. On-line you need a different PIN, aka a security code. That is in addition to supplying the 3-digit code on the back of the card Which is what I was referring to. Hardly a "PIN" as it is stamped on the back of the card and is mainly concerned with "cardholder not present" transactions. It is deliberately visible as it does not otherwise appear in the information contained in/on a card and requires use of a Mk.1 eyeball to read it thus cannot be determined by a magnetic stripe reader or from discarded undercopies if anywhere is still processing cards the old-fashioned way. (without which you won't get as far as the password challenge which cannot be all-numeric)and the requirement for goods to be delivered to the registered address. |
#488
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 25-Feb-12 11:30, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
Roland Perry wrote: at 16:40:17 on Sat, 25 Feb 2012, Adam H. Kerman remarked: Really? There's no concept of pre-authorizing the transaction, then charging the customer the approved charge in two separate steps, both performed at the retail terminal? No. I routinely spend amounts of the order of a thousand dollars at retailers by Chip and PIN card, and it's a one-shot process. If that's true, then I suspect your credit limit is stored on the card. In a typical transaction in the US, the customer or cashier swipes the card at the terminal (which one does it depends on the layout). Data is exchanged with the credit card processor's server. Data sent back to the merchant's terminal is the account credit limit (not disclosed to the cashier unless there is a situation with a high-value purchase like jewelry) and authorization code. Really? I've never heard of card processors telling merchants what the credit limit (or available credit, which is what I suspect you meant) on a card is, just whether the authorization attempt succeeded. Note that an authorization is for a particular amount of money, so there is no _need_ for the merchant to know how much credit is available in excess of that. The authorization code is critical, which is why merchants cooperate in pre-authorizing sales. If a merchant submits a transaction that wasn't pre-authorized and the bill isn't paid, the merchant's account is charged back. That's not how it works. Authorization is confirmation from the card issuers that a charge for the specified amount (or less) can be posted successfully. It has no effect on chargebacks; a customer can dispute posted charges whether or not they were authorized first. It also has nothing to do with whether the bill is paid, which is entirely a matter between the card issuer and the customer. During authorization, there is a temporary freeze put on the cardholder's credit limit in some fixed block amount, such as rounding up to the next $100. This block must exceed the actual purchase amount. Perhaps your issuer does that, but every card I've had puts a "hold" on the exact amount the merchant requested authorization for. Some merchants, eg. restaurants and bars, will authorize more than the total assuming you'll make additional purchases and/or add a tip, which gets corrected when the final charge is posted. I've never seen any other type of merchant do that. Gas stations usually authorize for $1 and then (try to) post the full amount. Technically this is risky for them, as the posting may be denied if the card doesn't have enough credit available at the time, but apparently the common risk is closed/over-limit cards. S -- Stephen Sprunk "God does not play dice." --Albert Einstein CCIE #3723 "God is an inveterate gambler, and He throws the K5SSS dice at every possible opportunity." --Stephen Hawking |
#489
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Not actually come across any contactless credit cards in the wild yet.
On-line you need a different PIN, aka a security code. I have a contactless AmEx in the U.S. which I can tap at the till in my local Wegmans supermarket (sort of like if Waitrose was owned by a family of Italian-Americans) and many convenience stores. Wegmans don't require a signature up to $50, tap or swipe. I really don't understand the resistance of US banks to chip+pin cards. Very few issue them, primarily for people who travel to other countries. Visa and MasterCard say that all their acquirers have to support chip+pin by April 2013 but I'll believe it when I see it. R's, John PS: Don't waste time arguing with Adam, unless you fancy a battle of wits with an unarmed opponent. -- Regards, John Levine, , Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies", Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. http://jl.ly |
#490
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , at 17:30:39 on Sat, 25 Feb
2012, Adam H. Kerman remarked: I routinely spend amounts of the order of a thousand dollars at retailers by Chip and PIN card, and it's a one-shot process. If that's true, then I suspect your credit limit is stored on the card. It isn't. What you have to accept is that things are done differently in USA vs the rest of the world. -- Roland Perry |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|