Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Recliner wrote:
Bruce wrote: I can't really see the point of this for the Metropolitan. The Circle/Hammersmith and City, yes. The District, perhaps. But these trains appear completely unsuited to Amersham and Chesham services because of their comparative lack of seating and its comparative lack of comfort. How anyone could select such trains for the Metropolitan simply beggars belief. Ah, the wonders of PPI schemes... Of course, initially the lack of seating was justified by the higher frequency and shorter running times that were planned to be introduced at the same time, thanks to the new signalling system Gordon Brown's PPI was always going to be a disaster. That much was clearly apparent even before it started. Many have said Brown insisted on it out of sheer spite to ensure that Ken Livingstone could not gain political capital from the improvements to the Underground. But after the PPI failed, there was still an opportunity to do something about the seating. You have to wonder what all the people are doing whose non-jobs were preserved after the PFI fell apart. They are employed expensively by Transport for London to do what appears to be f*** all. These are truly dreadful trains for the Metropolitan Line. Perhaps, before too long, someone will see sense and order proper seating for them. But I don't hold out much hope, and until then, I will use Chiltern, London Midland or my car. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Freight on the Metropolitan Line? | London Transport | |||
HST on west london freight line | London Transport | |||
Google Earth: new imagery: derailed freight? | London Transport | |||
Dudden Hill freight Line | London Transport | |||
Canal freight for T5? | London Transport |