Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Because of the recent interest in cell phones and railway
communications, the following is posted. In the 1969 the Penn Central introduced Metroliner premium passenger train service between NYC and Washington, DC. (It was developed by the Pennsylvania Railroad and the trains originally wore PRR keystone logos. They entered service after the Penn Central merger and continued into Amtrak*.) A feature of the new trains was onboard telephone service. Passengers could directly dial outward calls, and 'ashore' subscribers could telephone the train and have a passenger paged to the phone. The phones were located in a booth in the lounge car. In 1969, direct dial from pay phones, especially with Touch Tone, was still a novelty. The system used a pioneer approach of cellular technology, including automatic locating of the train for incoming calls. A Bell Laboratories Record magazine article describes the service technology. Interesting reading. http://long-lines.net/tech-equip/mob...9/076-077.html *Amtrak eventually replaced the original MU cars with refurbished locomotive hauled cars. Some of the original cars remain in service as cab cars for Amtrak push pull trains, such as on the route to Harrisburg. The Metroliner design inspired Amfleet, all built by Budd. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 3, 5:49*pm, "
wrote: Interesting. Any pictures of the phones themselves? The article had a drawing of one. But they looked basically like a standard single slot coin phone. Metro North Railroad, in New York, had installed phones on their trains, at least on the New Haven line EMUs in the late '90s, though the explosion of GSM service has since seen their demise. I remember they made a big deal about it when the phones went in, and I think there was a phone for every two calls of a train, which is a lot. If memory serves, they weren't that cheap to use, perhaps $1/minute. Presumably they contracted with a telephone carrier for the telephone sets and service. But I don't know who paid for the installation, which included the appropriate power supply for the phone and an antenna, plus all connections. As you mentioned, personal cell phones made the train phones obsolete. IIRC, it happened fairly quickly, probably before the installation cost was amortized. I wonder who got stuck with that expense. Amtrak also installed similar phones on their trains. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
" wrote: Metro North Railroad, in New York, had installed phones on their trains, at least on the New Haven line EMUs in the late '90s, though the explosion of GSM service has since seen their demise. Same thing here in Oregon and Washington with pay phones in the Cascades Talgo trains. When the trains were built in the mid-1990s there was still enough pay phone use for them to install pay phones in the vestibule areas between the cars. They had a modular phone receptacle in the side so that if you needed to contact someone with your computer and modem you could do it, but of course only for short periods as they didn't want people hogging the phones. When the trains were rebuilt a few years ago the pay phones were removed, and today they have WiFi on board. -- Please note this e-mail address is a pit of spam due to e-mail address harvesters on Usenet. Response time to e-mail sent here is slow. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Misleading article on Crossrail announcement | London Transport | |||
Independent article: Livingstone may run London rail network | London Transport | |||
Guardian article on LU PPP | London Transport | |||
Current Issues Article Archive | London Transport | |||
My article on London Transport | London Transport |