Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
e27002 wrote:
Last I knew the postal address Chessington, Surrey is/was actually in London. You can put "Chessington", "Chessington, Surrey", "Chessington, London", "Chessington, Greater London", "Chessington, Occupied Surrey", "Chessington, Neverneverland" or "Chessington, [Whatever]" on a postal address. Royal Mail no longer require counties to be included - they gave up in 1996 around the time of technological advancements and yet another round of local government reorganisation changing county boundaries. -- My blog: http://adf.ly/4hi4c |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 2, 10:39*pm, "Tim Roll-Pickering" T.C.Roll-
wrote: e27002 wrote: Last I knew the postal address Chessington, Surrey is/was actually in London. You can put "Chessington", "Chessington, Surrey", "Chessington, London", "Chessington, Greater London", "Chessington, Occupied Surrey", "Chessington, Neverneverland" or "Chessington, [Whatever]" on a postal address. Royal Mail no longer require counties to be included - they gave up in 1996 around the time of technological advancements and yet another round of local government reorganisation changing county boundaries. Understood. And it was a good thing. AFIK, the UK was the only entity still utilizing counties in mailing addresses. However, until 1996 the mailing address was CHESSINGTON, Surrey. And, many residents think of themselves as part of Surrey. None-the-less, they pay Council Tax to the GLA. This would be well and good if they had voted to become Londoners. They never did. In 1974 they simply woke up within the GLC. Southwark, Putney, Wimbledon, et al, suffered the same fate in 1889. No liberals screaming for democracy on this one! |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 3, 9:09*am, e27002 wrote:
On Jun 2, 10:39*pm, "Tim Roll-Pickering" wrote: e27002 wrote: *However, until 1996 the mailing address was CHESSINGTON, Surrey. *And, many residents think of themselves as part of Surrey. *None-the-less, they pay Council Tax to the GLA. This would be well and good if they had voted to become Londoners. They never did. *In 1974 they simply woke up within the GLC. Actually it was 1965. And I'm not sure it was that much of a surprise. Further east, Caterham and Warlingham UDC succesfully campaigned to be left out of Greater London, only to be swallowed up into the ridiculously named Tandridge District in 1974. Pity really as I would be entitled to a Freedom Pass by now and our roads would be maintained to a higher standard than the pathetic Surrey County Council manage. Peter |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
e27002 wrote:
You can put "Chessington", "Chessington, Surrey", "Chessington, London", "Chessington, Greater London", "Chessington, Occupied Surrey", "Chessington, Neverneverland" or "Chessington, [Whatever]" on a postal address. Royal no longer require counties to be included - they gave up in 1996 around the time of technological advancements and yet another round of local government reorganisation changing county boundaries. Understood. And it was a good thing. AFIK, the UK was the only entity still utilizing counties in mailing addresses. However, until 1996 the mailing address was CHESSINGTON, Surrey. And, many residents think of themselves as part of Surrey. None-the-less, they pay Council Tax to the GLA. This would be well and good if they had voted to become Londoners. They never did. In 1974 they simply woke up within the GLC. 1965 actually. Southwark, Putney, Wimbledon, et al, suffered the same fate in 1889. The London County Council broadly followed the Metropolitan Board of Works boundary. The metropolis had already reached that far. No liberals screaming for democracy on this one! Too late I'm afraid. There wasn't a tradition of local referendums on these things back then (or even now) but their neighbours in Epsom & Ewell kickd up enough fuss about the initial proposed boundary to get it revised for their exclusion (hence on the map Chessington looks like a penis). During the last GLA count we had hilarity when one ballot came up with a written message saying it was a disgrace the election was happening because Chislehurst voted by 95% against the Mayor & Assembly. The world does not revolve around Chislehurst. -- My blog: http://adf.ly/4hi4c |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 02/06/2012 14:45, e27002 wrote:
On Jun 2, 2:37 pm, "Tim Roll-Pickering"T.C.Roll- wrote: wrote: Overall the Overground is a great network. It joins together the networks in London proper, and the parts in annexed Surrey and Kent. What's this London proper as opposed to "annexed Surrey and Kent"? And what about "annexed Essex", "annexed Hertfordshire" and "still Hertfordshire"?! Middlesex was never South of the Thames. The creation of the LCC saw large chunks of Surrey and Kent Annexed to London. The creation of the GLC saw more land grabs. Last I knew the postal address Chessington, Surrey is/was actually in London. Essex and Herts? I agree, they have lost a chunk of their tax base. County Hall for Surrey, is in Kingston Upon Thames, which is now London (with a Surrey address) |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
So, what else is new?
|
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
London Bridge: 'Life threatening chaos' | London Transport | |||
London Bridge cable theivery chaos | London Transport | |||
Snowflake causes chaos | London Transport | |||
Tube chaos : Government spins into action | London Transport | |||
Airport chaos - It won't change | London Transport |