Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 6, 5:18*pm, allantracy wrote:
It’s noticeable that planned Crossrail services are primarily the inner suburban type of services rather than longer distance trains. Contrast that with Thameslink, which reaches out to Brighton, Bedford and, eventually, Cambridge. Is this not a missed opportunity? Why not Crossrail out to Oxford or Newbury, continuing the other side to Southend, Chelmsford, Colchester, Clacton or Ipswich seems like a monumental missed opportunity to me. Crossrail’s inners suburban mentality is far too parochial. Is Reading "Inner Suburban"? If it’s going to have the feel of a glorified Tube line then why not build it as such, note at much less cost. Crossrail will be much high capacity than any tube line. Moreover, the delays caused by changing trains at the termini will be eliminated. So what’s it to be, we’re building a mainline across London so how about some genuine mainline services or has it all been hijacked by that dreadful narrow-minded Overground concept? IMHO Thameslink is going to prove very hard to manage given its many branches and long distances. Delays will transmit thru the Thameslink system and affect timekeeping over a wide area. The trains being built for Crossrail are barely suitable for Reading to Shenfield never mind further afield. Men of my age tend to need the bathroom very often. Hey, what is your beef with the Overground dude? Give it a chance will ya. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Shortest Distance? | London Transport | |||
1951 original Direct Distance Dialing trial | London Transport | |||
Distance Based Zone Boundaries | London Transport | |||
Distance Based Zone Boundaries | London Transport | |||
Tube only short distance season tickets | London Transport |