Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 1 Jul 2012 09:11:06 +0000 (UTC), Alex Potter
wrote: On Sun, 01 Jul 2012 09:44:19 +0100, Roland Perry wrote: Blair and Prescott promised lots of things last time around, and failed to deliver. Why would Labour act differently next time (assuming they ever get a next time). Given that it's impossible to discern any difference between the parties, I doubt that they would. The article described something less than complete re-nationalisation anyway, so there'd still be plenty trough available for their mates. Yes, the subject heading is rather misleading. The railway network is already subject to public control, in the sense that it is heavily regulated. Ther article seems to be referring to ownership. The suggestion that labour has 'backed' the plans is misleading also as it seems to be a consultation document rather than a policy that has been adopted. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Labour backs plans to return railway network to public control - Guardian/Observer | London Transport | |||
German fare dodgers cause headache for public transport operators - The Guardian | London Transport | |||
Hush News: Gang of Labour's African Guests Impale White Lad on TreeStake | London Transport | |||
Sir Terry Farrell backs Euston as venue for London high speedrail hub | London Transport | |||
Times: Ken plans to take public control of rail services | London Transport |