Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#121
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Roland Perry" wrote in message ... In message , at 15:35:23 on Sat, 24 Nov 2012, Portsmouth Rider remarked: But it's not a local bus service. It's an emergency bustitution. Which is exactly what at least three posters to this thread have been telling you for the last few days. Unless the bus stop has a prohibition on "Stopping", other than local buses (there are some of those, but generally only in very congested city centres) then anyone can stop to let a passenger out. As a car driver, I don't need to register with the authorities weeks in advance to stop there. Your car is not operated for hire or reward. You do not need a PCV licence to drive your car. Your car cannot carry more than eight people Your car is not operated under an O licence Your car is not subject to an MOT test at one year old Your car is unlikely to fail an MOT because of a missing fire extinguisher, or a torn seat, or even just for "being dirty". Your car is unlikely to have a bell or buzzer so passengers can signal you to stop. Your passengers are allowed to chat with you whilst you are driving. You are not (usually) allowed to charge fares in your car. You are not allowed to operate your car with as little as 1mm of tyre tread. In other words, your car is Cat M1. A bus can be Cat M2 or more likely Cat M3 a.. Category M1: Vehicles designed and constructed for the carriage of passengers and comprising no more than eight seats in addition to the driver's seat. b.. Category M2: Vehicles designed and constructed for the carriage of passengers, comprising more than eight seats in addition to the driver's seat, and having a maximum mass not exceeding 5 tonnes. c.. Category M3: Vehicles designed and constructed for the carriage of passengers, comprising more than eight seats in addition to the driver's seat, and having a maximum mass exceeding 5 tonnes. |
#122
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In uk.transport.london message bYGdnfZVAsq0yDPNnZ2dnUVZ7tmdnZ2d@brightv
iew.com, Thu, 22 Nov 2012 16:39:21, Portsmouth Rider posted: Absolutely. Same sort of thing happens on Rail Replacement trips... passengers want to be let off all over the place, when the contract is for either actual railway station forecourts, or suitable SPECIFIED bus stops on the main road nearby. I've actually had passengers forcing the emergency door at traffic lights. And once you allow one passenger a unspecified stop, they all want one - when you have to get the bus (and through passengers) on to the station where the train set has been nailed together again, with the minimum of delay..... An intelligent Rail Replacement system would have, defined in the contract, a limited number of additional non-railway-station stops, at existing major transport interchanges, where such existed on the best route from station to station or another route almost as good. The stops would be chosen to maximise the expected overall customer satisfaction. -- (c) John Stockton, nr London, UK. For Mail, see Home Page. Turnpike, WinXP. Web http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/ - FAQ-type topics, acronyms, and links. Command-prompt MiniTrue is useful for viewing/searching/altering files. Free, DOS/Win/UNIX now 2.0.6; see URL:http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/pc-links.htm. |
#123
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , at 18:38:46 on Sat, 24
Nov 2012, Graeme Wall remarked: And you've got that bit wrong as well. I'm tempted to ask why you think I've got it wrong, but you never respond to such requests, so I won't. Because the comments were about people alighting, not boarding. I've not asked for anyone to be able to board en-route. -- Roland Perry |
#124
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Roland Perry" wrote in message news ![]() In message , at 18:38:46 on Sat, 24 Nov 2012, Graeme Wall remarked: And you've got that bit wrong as well. I'm tempted to ask why you think I've got it wrong, but you never respond to such requests, so I won't. Because the comments were about people alighting, not boarding. I've not asked for anyone to be able to board en-route. Doesn't matter - set down; board - still a local bus service subject to local bus service legislation. Contracts are different - they are operated under contract, and what the customer wants, the customer gets. And, for clarity, customer in this context is the rail operator. Who is unlikely to specify stops away from the actual sattion, unless there are good reasons for it (like access, low bridge, etc). Why don't you just give up? after all, even YOU must be able to see that you are on a hiding to nothing. Wibbling about it on Usenet won't change anything. Write and complain to the rail operator, and waste THEIR time. I don't intend to waste amy more of MY time on this topic - it has been exhaustively explained to you. Bye. -- Portsmouthrider |
#125
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Roland Perry
writes The thoughtless pratts are the people who think it's clever to make the bus passengers walk a mile in the dark and the rain, rather than dropping them off somewhere more convenient that they happened to be passing. I am not a thoughtless prat and I certainly don't think it clever to refuse to stop wherever I'm requested. In fact, I find it quite hard to say no. However, once a driver has said 'yes' to the first person to ask he must then say 'yes' to every other request to drop passengers where they want. To act in any other way would be totally unfair. The first requester may be young fit and travelling without luggage so a quick stop to drop them off would seem quite reasonable. But, as I said, you can't then reasonably refuse the next passenger who may be frail and travelling with luggage stored in the luggage space which then has to be retrieved. It may surprise you, but I promise it's true, that once passengers realise that you will stop by request their requests become ever more demanding. You drop one passenger and just as you pull away another request is made for 'the next corner, please' which is less than 100 yards further on! It can become quite ridiculous but you can't then start inventing rules like stops must be at least 800 yards apart! Malcolm |
#126
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , at
20:42:17 on Sat, 24 Nov 2012, Portsmouth Rider remarked: I don't intend to waste amy more of MY time on this topic - it has been exhaustively explained to you. That's my view too. The "can't do" attitude of the railways couldn't have been more starkly demonstrated. -- Roland Perry |
#127
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , at 18:39:12 on Sat, 24
Nov 2012, Graeme Wall remarked: "Second tree from the station" then. Still a muddy grass verge. But an official muddy grass verge. I'd love to see the risk assessment that said it was safer for the passengers than a lit bus stop on the High Street. -- Roland Perry |
#128
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , at
19:11:06 on Sat, 24 Nov 2012, Portsmouth Rider remarked: A bus that is on Rail Work must stop at the place that is on the Con-tract, and must not stop at any oth-er place to set down or pick up. Why? They aren't in competition with local buses, and it's safer to drop someone at a lit bus stop on the High Street than an unlit muddy grass verge that just happens to be nearer the station. -- Roland Perry |
#129
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , at 21:02:56 on Sat, 24 Nov
2012, Malcolm Loades remarked: It may surprise you, but I promise it's true, that once passengers realise that you will stop by request their requests become ever more demanding. You drop one passenger and just as you pull away another request is made for 'the next corner, please' which is less than 100 yards further on! It can become quite ridiculous but you can't then start inventing rules like stops must be at least 800 yards apart! You could always stipulate that the stops must be at marked bus stops. Or if there are only three people on the bus at the time, not be so pedantic. -- Roland Perry |
#130
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 19:42:31 on Fri, 23 Nov 2012, John Williamson remarked: Clearing snow can leave you responsible for the consequences if you do it and don't leave a safe surface. Not since the "Snow Code" was introduced two years ago. The Snow Code is not statute law, and it is not common law either. It is advice to the public by an official body, that is all. The law has not changed in any way because of it, The Snow Code even states that you can be held responsible for the consequences if you do not do a good enough job, while failing to define what a good enough job is. -- Tciao for Now! John. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Drivers telling passengers to use the emergency buttons... | London Transport | |||
underground drivers waiting for passengers | London Transport | |||
Passenger door buttons gone on refurb D Stock | London Transport | |||
What aren't they telling us? | London Transport | |||
Bus Use in London Emergency | London Transport |