On 06/11/2012 17:55, tim..... wrote:

"Nick Finnigan" wrote in message
...
On 06/11/2012 15:06, tim..... wrote:

consultation period. That consultation is just about the fines that should
be levied for non-payment, but necessarily includes the details of the
collection method that will be employed that incurs those fines. If

There are no details of collection methods.

automatic post pay were an "approved" method ISTM that this would be there
as there is still a need for "fines" with that method.

Well, no, there is no need for fines if a method of payment has been used.

You need (FSVO need) a method to "fine" the people who haven't registered a
payment method (and don't manually post pay)

They want a method to "fine" people who don't pay promptly.
Even if the vehicle has a registered a payment method.

"Nick Finnigan" wrote in message
...
On 06/11/2012 17:55, tim..... wrote:

"Nick Finnigan" wrote in message
...
On 06/11/2012 15:06, tim..... wrote:

consultation period. That consultation is just about the fines that
should
be levied for non-payment, but necessarily includes the details of the
collection method that will be employed that incurs those fines. If

There are no details of collection methods.

automatic post pay were an "approved" method ISTM that this would be
there
as there is still a need for "fines" with that method.

Well, no, there is no need for fines if a method of payment has been
used.

You need (FSVO need) a method to "fine" the people who haven't registered
a
payment method (and don't manually post pay)

They want a method to "fine" people who don't pay promptly.
Even if the vehicle has a registered a payment method.

As that just seems to be a repeat of what I have already said (twice), I can
only assume you are questioning if that is what I meant

so the answer is yes, that is exactly what I meant

tim