Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 13:16:57 -0000
"Paul Scott" wrote: wrote in message ... Was it really necessary for the body to taper in so severely at floor level? I realise the lower floor means it has to be cut back for curved platforms but it leaves a huge potentially dangerous gap at certain stations. Was it really worth it just for those mythical wheelchair users who don't exist? The aim was to build a 'go-anywhere' common stock for all the SSR routes, not just the Met. Once the A, C and D stock have all been replaced perhaps they'll be altering the stepping distances at various stations? Stepping distances? There will always be certain stations where a compromise height/gap is needed though, eg where tube gauge stock or NR stock uses the same platforms. Well at aldwych the friend I was with almost slipped onto the tracks because of the huge gap to the platform. It wasn't funny and it would probably be bloody dangerous for someone with impaired vision if they didn't know about it. B2003 |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Why isn't the 2009 stock walk through like the S stock? | London Transport | |||
TfL / NLL / Metronet surface stock / tube stock / Croxley link | London Transport | |||
1938 Stock on Uxbridge 100 and T Stock? | London Transport |