Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 13:16:57 -0000 "Paul Scott" wrote: wrote in message ... Was it really necessary for the body to taper in so severely at floor level? I realise the lower floor means it has to be cut back for curved platforms but it leaves a huge potentially dangerous gap at certain stations. Was it really worth it just for those mythical wheelchair users who don't exist? The aim was to build a 'go-anywhere' common stock for all the SSR routes, not just the Met. Once the A, C and D stock have all been replaced perhaps they'll be altering the stepping distances at various stations? Stepping distances? Move the coping stones on the platform. You couldn't do that with A stock still running, at Euston Square there wasn't much of a gap to mind - about half an inch if that. Neil -- Neil Williams in Milton Keynes, UK. Put first name before the at to reply. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Why isn't the 2009 stock walk through like the S stock? | London Transport | |||
TfL / NLL / Metronet surface stock / tube stock / Croxley link | London Transport | |||
1938 Stock on Uxbridge 100 and T Stock? | London Transport |