Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
From Watford Observer Friday, January 23, 2004
Future is bleak for Croxley Rail Link Confusion surrounds the future of the Croxley Rail Link with the Government and London Underground blaming each other for the scheme's recent failure to secure funding. And in a separate development this week it emerged that the link, which has been dogged by delays and setbacks, faces being scrapped altogether as the project site could be sold to developers next year. This week, the Department of Transport (DFT) agreed to consider funding the £97million project but only if Tube bosses back it by paying about 25 per cent of the overall cost. In a letter to transport watchdog, the London Transport Users Committee (LTUC) transport minister Tony McNulty said the proposal to link the Metropolitan Line to Watford Junction was "very commendable" and had "technical merit". But London Underground has flatly refused to stump up any cash until the Government does the same. "We are disappointed at the recent decision by the DFT not to grant the funding for the link at this stage" said spokeswoman Ann Laker. And at a Watford Council cabinet meeting on Monday, the confusion deepened further when corporate director Mike Hayes told councillors that the scheme had only just lost out on Government funding last month. "It is a sorry tale because the story from the Government officers is that the plan in the bidding process was doing extremely well until the last minute," he said. Meanwhile, the LTUC warned this week that time is running out for the scheme. From 2005 Network Rail can sell the land off, the group said. "This golden opportunity to regenerate Watford's transport infrastructure could be lost if London Underground doesn't agree to invest in the future of passengers," said committee director Rufus Barnes. "This is a relatively small rail scheme compared with Crossrail Thameslink 2000 or even the East London line extensions, but the benefits to users will be substantial. "It would be a disaster if the present opportunity to build it were to be lost forever." London Underground said it would hold urgent talks with the Government to discuss how to resolve the impasse. John Burke Watford Rail User Group |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "JWBA68" wrote in message ... From Watford Observer Friday, January 23, 2004 Future is bleak for Croxley Rail Link What a disgusting and disgraceful state of affairs this is. Typical of this country's lack of forward thinking over the past thirty years. It's a miracle that the Channel Tunnel ever got built! Here's a project which screams out "common sense" - use an existing railway to link an Underground line that currently terminates in the middle of nowhere to a major railway junction where it will provide frequent connections both into and out of long distance services and generally benefit the community and it's bogged down by the pen-pushers squabbling like a bunch of little girls at a tea party. They should be ashamed of themselves. As usual, it's the long-suffering travelling public who will fail to benefit and who will have to continue using road transport (public or private) to gain access to Watford town centre and the West Coast Main Line. Pathetic! |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"JWBA68" wrote in message
... From Watford Observer Friday, January 23, 2004 This week, the Department of Transport (DFT) agreed to consider funding the £97million project but only if Tube bosses back it by paying about 25 per cent of the overall cost. But London Underground has flatly refused to stump up any cash until the Government does the same. Am I reading this right? Government won't give money until LU does, and LU won't give money until government does? London Underground said it would hold urgent talks with the Government to discuss how to resolve the impasse. Let's hope a third party with a brain is also present. -- John Rowland - Spamtrapped Transport Plans for the London Area, updated 2001 http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Acro...69/tpftla.html A man's vehicle is a symbol of his manhood. That's why my vehicle's the Piccadilly Line - It's the size of a county and it comes every two and a half minutes |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Am I reading this right? Government won't give money until LU does, and LU
won't give money until government does? Yes! but don't blame us for not building it, it was there fault for not coming up with the cash Guv. Paul |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
CJG Now Thankfully Living In The North wrote:
(JWBA68) wrote in message ... From Watford Observer Friday, January 23, 2004 Future is bleak for Croxley Rail Link Confusion surrounds the future of the Croxley Rail Link with the Government and London Underground blaming each other for the scheme's recent failure to secure Why exactly do they want Croxley Green station to re-open? Its in the middle of nowhere and there is nothing nearby. The Croxley L.U. station is in a far better postion in terms of actually being in civilisation. Croxley LU is not going to close as part of the Croxley Link. The only station to be closed would be Watford Met. L.U's Watford station is also while not in the town centre in an area where people actually live. Maybe if it were on the other side of Cassiobury Park. And there are loads of links into London from Watford Town centre. I think it will be a waste of money. And if they really want it built why not ask the Croxley Business Park which is right behind Croxley Green station to put some money up to have it built. The Link isn't necessarily about journeys from Watford into London but will provide useful local links into Watford from suburbs which are currently nearby geographically but have no direct rail link into the town. It will also provide more useful access to and from the West Coast Main Line for these suburbs, at pretty low cost. It also provides an opportunity for direct services from towns along the Chiltern Line which have workers travelling to Watford, like Wendover, Amersham and Rickmansworth. Such a service isn't included in the project but is would require no extra infrastructure in addition to the existing Link project. -- Dave Arquati Imperial College, SW7 |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() The Link isn't necessarily about journeys from Watford into London but will provide useful local links into Watford from suburbs which are currently nearby geographically but have no direct rail link into the town. It will also provide more useful access to and from the West Coast Main Line for these suburbs, at pretty low cost. So people get off at Watford Junction and then a bus takes them out into the suburbs of Watford. The point still is there is nothing nearby Croxley Green station to make it worthwhile to be kept. If you want to re-open old train lines and provide train links to the subhurbs of towns and cities around London and the home counties Im sure a lot of people could give more needy examples than Watford |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
CJG Now Thankfully Living In The North wrote:
The Link isn't necessarily about journeys from Watford into London but will provide useful local links into Watford from suburbs which are currently nearby geographically but have no direct rail link into the town. It will also provide more useful access to and from the West Coast Main Line for these suburbs, at pretty low cost. So people get off at Watford Junction and then a bus takes them out into the suburbs of Watford. I mean suburbs like Croxley, Northwood, Pinner and even Harrow-on-the-Hill (which is pretty poorly linked to the WCML despite being almost next to it). Yes, you could get a bus to Wealdstone, a train to Watford Junction and then another train from there... but why not just get one train to Watford Junction? It's much more attractive. The point still is there is nothing nearby Croxley Green station to make it worthwhile to be kept. The link isn't designed to solely reopen Croxley Green station! Anyway, what's wrong with the Croxley Centre industrial park? If you want to re-open old train lines and provide train links to the subhurbs of towns and cities around London and the home counties Im sure a lot of people could give more needy examples than Watford As cheaply and to as important a place? -- Dave Arquati Imperial College, SW7 |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "CJG Now Thankfully Living In The North" wrote in message om... So people get off at Watford Junction and then a bus takes them out into the suburbs of Watford. The point still is there is nothing nearby Croxley Green station to make it worthwhile to be kept. If you want to re-open old train lines and provide train links to the subhurbs of towns and cities around London and the home counties Im sure a lot of people could give more needy examples than Watford Have you ever tried getting off a train at Watford Junction and then trying to get home to Northwood, Moor Park, Rickmansworth, Chorleywood? From Harefield or Croxley to King's Langley/Apsley/Hemel? Not easy. Croxley Green station is an irrelevance. It makes little difference to the project whether it opens or not. Many people from the west of Watford currently drive into Watford town centre because public transport from the west side of town is so bad. The Metropolitan line ends in the middle of nowhere, at Cassiobury Drive, requiring a walk across Cassiobury Park (not lit or pleasant after dark) and down Rickmansworth Road to reach the town centre. Taking the Met line to Watford High Street and Watford Junction would provide public transport opportunities that are currently denied to many people. The trackbed for the link is in place (barring the bridge linking the Metropolitan to the branch at Croxley) and decaying further by the year. Surely it makes more sense to reinstate a *useful* service than to reinstate a *useless* service (to Croxley Green) or abandon the formation entirely? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
CROXLEY RAIL LINK MOVES ONE STEP CLOSER | London Transport | |||
An open letter regarding Croxley Rail link | London Transport | |||
Croxley Rail Link - Position Update October 2007 | London Transport | |||
Croxley Rail Link Petition | London Transport | |||
CROXLEY RAIL LINK - POSITION UPDATE - February 2007 | London Transport |