| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
 |
|
Menu
| London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
| Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
| London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
| Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
November 18th 12, 12:51 PM
posted to uk.railway,uk.transport.london
|
|||
|
|||
Ultimate signaling balls up at London Bridge
On Nov 18, 9:29*am, Graeme Wall wrote:
On 18/11/2012 00:01, djxc6 wrote: Edit. Opening paragraph should be arriving at LB at 19:30 and catching 19:45 FCC service, not an hour later! Further edit, it is "should HAVE" **not* "should OF" Signalling has two ls. Quintishill was a more substantial signalling balls up. ian |
|
#2
November 18th 12, 12:55 PM
posted to uk.railway,uk.transport.london
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ultimate signaling balls up at London Bridge
On 18/11/2012 13:51, ian batten wrote:
On Nov 18, 9:29 am, Graeme wrote: On 18/11/2012 00:01, djxc6 wrote: Edit. Opening paragraph should be arriving at LB at 19:30 and catching 19:45 FCC service, not an hour later! Further edit, it is "should HAVE" *not* "should OF" Signalling has two ls. Quintishill was a more substantial signalling balls up. And has an "n" :-) -- Graeme Wall This account not read, substitute trains for rail. Railway Miscellany at http://www.greywall.demon.co.uk/rail |
|
#3
November 18th 12, 01:19 PM
posted to uk.railway,uk.transport.london
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ultimate signaling balls up at London Bridge
On 18/11/2012 13:55, Graeme Wall wrote:
On 18/11/2012 13:51, ian batten wrote: On Nov 18, 9:29 am, Graeme wrote: On 18/11/2012 00:01, djxc6 wrote: Edit. Opening paragraph should be arriving at LB at 19:30 and catching 19:45 FCC service, not an hour later! Further edit, it is "should HAVE" *not* "should OF" Signalling has two ls. Quintishill was a more substantial signalling balls up. And has an "n" :-) Two... -- Phil Cook |
|
#4
November 18th 12, 01:25 PM
posted to uk.railway,uk.transport.london
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ultimate signaling balls up at London Bridge
On 18/11/2012 14:19, Phil Cook wrote:
On 18/11/2012 13:55, Graeme Wall wrote: On 18/11/2012 13:51, ian batten wrote: On Nov 18, 9:29 am, Graeme wrote: On 18/11/2012 00:01, djxc6 wrote: Edit. Opening paragraph should be arriving at LB at 19:30 and catching 19:45 FCC service, not an hour later! Further edit, it is "should HAVE" *not* "should OF" Signalling has two ls. Quintishill was a more substantial signalling balls up. And has an "n" :-) Two... Doh! -- Graeme Wall This account not read, substitute trains for rail. Railway Miscellany at http://www.greywall.demon.co.uk/rail |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| London Waterloo to London Bridge Crossrail | London Transport | |||
| Waterloo to London Bridge for cheapjacks (London Terminals ticket) | London Transport | |||
| LEZ phase 3 for vans and minibuses scrapped - Boris has no balls | London Transport | |||
| Diversion of the South London Line from London Bridge | London Transport | |||
| East London Line - what happens to the London Bridge services? | London Transport | |||
Hybrid Mode
