Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , at 20:02:52 on
Thu, 29 Nov 2012, Paul Corfield remarked: I have read that card reading speed specs have had to be relaxed by TfL and also that the security requirements imposed by the Banks were changed part way through the development process. Normally the banks want a random selection of "waves" to be backed up by a PIN, which is presumably difficult on a bus. I know next to nothing about how Pay Wave / EMV card security works. This is what one of my card issuers says: "MBNA has added layers of security to their cards. For example, contactless cards cannot be used until a PIN is entered on first use; payments are limited to up to £15 per transaction; and customers will occasionally be asked to enter their PIN number to ensure the transactions are valid." The first one is clearly to stop cards "lost in the post" being used as Paywave, £15 is quite low (some foreign cards are up to $100), and it's the latter which is difficult on buses. When Paywave was first introduced the "occasionally" was claimed to be about 1:10. However EMV is used for low value transactions by a growing number of retailers without PIN validation. I assume that whatever is deemed reasonable for retailers would broadly be OK for bus travel given a PAYG fare is only £1.35. You'd have to be going some to be able to rip off anything like a large sum of money ;-) If the "relaxation" referred to earlier is never having to type in a PIN, there's a danger that a lost/stolen card becomes a "free season ticket" for the lucky recipient. Unless the terminals have a blacklist of such cards, and maybe implementing that is what's causing the delay? I am also pretty sure that I read somewhere that the initial launch of the bus product will NOT include capping. To be fair, until you can cap both tube and bus onto one card, the market for a bus-only cap is rather small. Yes only 6m passenger journeys per day on London's buses and only 99% of those trips use contactless cards. Clearly PAYG is a subset of that total but there is still considerable volume that might well find bus only validation a viable option. The audience is people who have so far not got an Oyster (so that rules out most London-based frequent travellers) and for whom getting an Oyster is a barrier (so that includes tourists, and yes I know you can get one fairly easily but there's the issue of getting back your deposit and unused credit while running for a plane at Heathrow), or who only wants to do one or two trips that day, or who doesn't mid being charged above the normal daily cap. A TfL rail and bus cap will be more attractive but that is clearly a later phase. I am unsure when National Rail will be added even though TfL kit exists at all the relevant stations. I suspect that will depress take up. Sounds like short term it's another "tourist tax" for people who haven't got an Oyster. No it does not. It sounds like the first phase of the project. Oyster's introduction was phased and progressive and the move to EMV is a completely different way of handling transactions for travel on TfL services. Although without a cap the system isn't doing very much, it's simply collecting individual ad-hoc payments just like coffee shops have been doing for years. It is not remotely surprising that TfL are being cautious in their approach to introducing this technology. It will only take a few nasty "errors" that receive disproportionate media attention for the concept to be potentially damaged. I don't imagine anyone with any sense would countenance a rash "big bang" approach to introducing complex, unfamiliar technology. The technology of the terminals should be familiar enough, but I agree that the retrospective capping (which they aren't doing yet, obviously) will be fun. -- Roland Perry |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , at 09:54:56 on Fri, 30 Nov
2012, martin_petrov remarked: This could be why my attempt to get on a bus this morning caused a bad BEEP from the machine and the message "more than one card trying to be used at the same time" - I have in my Oystercard wallet, 1 Oystercard, and 1 contactless debit card. Am I going to have to use different wallets now to avoid this? I've only just 'rationalised' my wallet far enough to have just a debit card, and Oystercard and work entry card with Oystercard wallet. I'll be pained to change this all again! I wonder what happens if you try to touch-in with a Barclays "Onepulse" Oyster card, which now has Paywave added. Something to try next time I'm in London! -- Roland Perry |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On 30/11/2012 10:16, Roland Perry wrote: In message , at 09:54:56 on Fri, 30 Nov 2012, martin_petrov remarked: This could be why my attempt to get on a bus this morning caused a bad BEEP from the machine and the message "more than one card trying to be used at the same time" - I have in my Oystercard wallet, 1 Oystercard, and 1 contactless debit card. Am I going to have to use different wallets now to avoid this? I've only just 'rationalised' my wallet far enough to have just a debit card, and Oystercard and work entry card with Oystercard wallet. I'll be pained to change this all again! I wonder what happens if you try to touch-in with a Barclays "Onepulse" Oyster card, which now has Paywave added. Something to try next time I'm in London! Barclaycard OnePulse cards always had payWave functionality, it's not a recent addition - that was part of the original selling point. |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , at 12:28:41 on Fri, 30 Nov
2012, Mizter T remarked: I wonder what happens if you try to touch-in with a Barclays "Onepulse" Oyster card, which now has Paywave added. Something to try next time I'm in London! Barclaycard OnePulse cards always had payWave functionality, it's not a recent addition - that was part of the original selling point. Fair enough, but what will happen (soon) on a London Bus: which of the two elements will "win"; or will it refuse to pick either, claiming you are trying to use more than one card at once? -- Roland Perry |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 30 Nov 2012 12:44:18 +0000, Roland Perry
wrote: In message , at 12:28:41 on Fri, 30 Nov 2012, Mizter T remarked: Barclaycard OnePulse cards always had payWave functionality, it's not a recent addition - that was part of the original selling point. Fair enough, but what will happen (soon) on a London Bus: which of the two elements will "win"; or will it refuse to pick either, claiming you are trying to use more than one card at once? Unless the two elements are connected and can decide between themselves, which is almost impossible to believe, then it's like having an Oyster and a PayWave in the same wallet, which already causes trouble. My wallet, with Oyster, ITSO and a Spanish one (not sure what standard that one is) is guaranteed to fail! Richard. |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 30 Nov 2012 01:57:12 +0000, Steve Fitzgerald
] wrote: My understanding is (from being involved with a group that accepts cards and gets all the card acceptor bumph) that this Pay Wave will only work for a number (ISTR about 5 or 6) of P-W transactions before it then requires a PIN input. [...] Now, how this works with the bus scenario is an interesting exercise for the reader but could explain some of the 'issues' that have been alluded to. It would be impractical to ask for the PIN on a bus, at least in London... I wonder whether there is a way for the retailer to accept higher risk in return for never (or much more rarely) requiring a PIN, especially as no real goods are involved? Richard. |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 30, 12:44*pm, Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 12:28:41 on Fri, 30 Nov 2012, Mizter T remarked: I wonder what happens if you try to touch-in with a Barclays "Onepulse" Oyster card, which now has Paywave added. Something to try next time I'm in London! Barclaycard OnePulse cards always had payWave functionality, it's not a recent addition - that was part of the original selling point. Fair enough, but what will happen (soon) on a London Bus: which of the two elements will "win"; or will it refuse to pick either, claiming you are trying to use more than one card at once? -- Roland Perry I guess all the OnePulse cards will have to be replaced with non- Oyster visa cards and all current cardholders instructed not to use their current OnePulses on buses? |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On 30/11/2012 12:44, Roland Perry wrote: In message , at 12:28:41 on Fri, 30 Nov 2012, Mizter T remarked: I wonder what happens if you try to touch-in with a Barclays "Onepulse" Oyster card, which now has Paywave added. Something to try next time I'm in London! Barclaycard OnePulse cards always had payWave functionality, it's not a recent addition - that was part of the original selling point. Fair enough, but what will happen (soon) on a London Bus: which of the two elements will "win"; or will it refuse to pick either, claiming you are trying to use more than one card at once? I'd imagine the Oyster element would 'win', but lets wait and see. By the by, the OnePulse card had been taken off the market by Barclaycard (for new applicants) when this whole issue was last discussed - I see it's now offered again (I don't know how long it was off the market for): http://www.barclaycard.co.uk/onepulse |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On 01/12/2012 10:48, Richard wrote: On Fri, 30 Nov 2012 12:44:18 +0000, Roland Perry wrote: In message , at 12:28:41 on Fri, 30 Nov 2012, Mizter T remarked: Barclaycard OnePulse cards always had payWave functionality, it's not a recent addition - that was part of the original selling point. Fair enough, but what will happen (soon) on a London Bus: which of the two elements will "win"; or will it refuse to pick either, claiming you are trying to use more than one card at once? Unless the two elements are connected and can decide between themselves, which is almost impossible to believe, The OnePulse card was specifically designed so that the payWave and Oyster elements of the card didn't conflict, so my understanding is that they are in at least one sense 'connected'. (Curious why you think such a thing is almost impossible to believe?) then it's like having an Oyster and a PayWave in the same wallet, which already causes trouble. My wallet, with Oyster, ITSO and a Spanish one (not sure what standard that one is) is guaranteed to fail! Well, what we can be sure of is that no-one at TfL could possibly have considered this scenario... |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard wrote:
Unless the two elements are connected and can decide between themselves, which is almost impossible to believe, then it's like having an Oyster and a PayWave in the same wallet, which already causes trouble. My wallet, with Oyster, ITSO and a Spanish one (not sure what standard that one is) is guaranteed to fail! Yet mine, with an Oyster and two Paywaves, works fine. Is it feasible to make it choose an Oyster over other cards also present? It will be a definite hassle compared with what went before not just to be able to whack your wallet on the barrier. A market for tin foil wallets outside that of the paranoid? Neil -- Neil Williams in Milton Keynes, UK. Put first name before the at to reply. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
TfL, Oyster, contactless payment cards and Apple Pay. | London Transport | |||
Contactless payment on tube | London Transport | |||
London buses to offer contactless payment card option from tomorrow(12/12/12) | London Transport | |||
Transport Committee's view on "wave and pay" | London Transport | |||
Your Auto top-up payment has failed | London Transport |