Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
What did they use to fill in the old shoreditch cutting? They didn't dig
any new tunnels on the ELL so the earth couldn't have come from there. Was it from crossrail or did they not actually fill it in but just roofed it over and put a thin layer of dirt on top? B2003 |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in message
... What did they use to fill in the old shoreditch cutting? They didn't dig any new tunnels on the ELL so the earth couldn't have come from there. Was it from crossrail or did they not actually fill it in but just roofed it over and put a thin layer of dirt on top? Crossrail hadn't started digging anywhere when it was being filled surely? But it is definitely filled in nearly as far as the old station building with compacted earth and rubble, the ramped track bed rising up to the GEML bridge is in or over the cutting for much of its length. Perhaps they used spoil from the Bishopsgate goods yard site which was being demolished at the time to make room for the new Shoreditch High St station to be built? Paul S |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 30 Nov 2012 16:24:51 -0000
"Paul Scott" wrote: But it is definitely filled in nearly as far as the old station building with compacted earth and rubble, the ramped track bed rising up to the GEML bridge is in or over the cutting for much of its length. Perhaps they used spoil from the Bishopsgate goods yard site which was being demolished at the time to make room for the new Shoreditch High St station to be built? That could be part of it , but I doubt that building would have been enough for the entire cutting. Hopefully they didn't use landfill. It seems an awful lot of effort to go to just to add a few square metres of grass in a park. I wonder why they didn't just leave it perhaps to be used as sidings for the liverpool street lines in the future? B2003 |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
On Fri, 30 Nov 2012 16:24:51 -0000 "Paul Scott" wrote: But it is definitely filled in nearly as far as the old station building with compacted earth and rubble, the ramped track bed rising up to the GEML bridge is in or over the cutting for much of its length. Perhaps they used spoil from the Bishopsgate goods yard site which was being demolished at the time to make room for the new Shoreditch High St station to be built? That could be part of it , but I doubt that building would have been enough for the entire cutting. Hopefully they didn't use landfill. It seems an awful lot of effort to go to just to add a few square metres of grass in a park. I wonder why they didn't just leave it perhaps to be used as sidings for the liverpool street lines in the future? You can make more money by using your land as a hardcore/soil infill site than for virtually any other use. £50/ton is typical, so a lorry load is £500+. If the NR/BR Land Agents were on the ball, they would have done this, and made a good profit on it. A building contractor would love such a site - close by to central London, cheaper than a commercial tip, thus gaining them time and money. Planning restrictions are much lighter too, there would be virtually no chance of using it for rubbish/landfill, but filling with soil is usually allowed with certain restrictions. -- To reply by e-mail, change the ' + ' to 'plus'. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in message
... I wonder if they demolished all the station paraphenalia first or just entombed the lot. Will the 23rd century edition of Time Team be unearthing the platforms perhaps? Google maps satellite view shows exactly where the boundary is between what they've buried and the old station: http://goo.gl/maps/Po6hy The last photo on the 'disused stations' web page for Shoreditch underground suggests some platform structures are still there under the fill material, wherever it came from: http://www.disused-stations.org.uk/s...el/index.shtml Paul S |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 3 Dec 2012 11:34:34 -0000
"Paul Scott" wrote: wrote in message ... I wonder if they demolished all the station paraphenalia first or just entombed the lot. Will the 23rd century edition of Time Team be unearthing the platforms perhaps? Google maps satellite view shows exactly where the boundary is between what they've buried and the old station: http://goo.gl/maps/Po6hy That looks like a lot of weight now pushing out on the retaining walls over the liverpool street lines. I wonder if thats a good idea long term? B2003 |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
No Crossrail stations to be scrapped in cost-cutting | London Transport | |||
Shoreditch RIP | London Transport | |||
Shoreditch Station | London Transport | |||
Southern cutting services | London Transport | |||
Shoreditch tube | London Transport |