| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
 |
|
Menu
| London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
| London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#17
December 31st 12, 07:51 PM
posted to uk.transport.london
|
|||
|
|||
Met line signalling
wrote:
On Mon, 31 Dec 2012 20:12:10 +0000 Paul Corfield wrote: to the market to get a better value deal. I'm sure you would support a more affordable solution rather than continuing with one which was considered to be poor value for money. I would if I didn't suspect it'll end up costing a lot more in the long run trying to maintain umpteen different systems. What happens in 20 years time when experts are needed for all of them and probably half the companies who developed them have gone bust or been taken over and the new owners have little incentive to spend money developing upgrades? At least with just one system you could mitigate against that by creating your own in house team but with 3 or 4? Unlikely. Perhaps the Jubilee resignalling is an experience to be avoided? |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Northern Line Signalling | London Transport | |||
| Victoria line signalling | London Transport | |||
| Victoria line signalling | London Transport | |||
| Baker St.(Met) and Met operations | London Transport | |||
| LU multiple-aspect signalling | London Transport | |||
![Recliner[_2_] is offline](https://www.londonbanter.co.uk/images/SultanThemeVB3R/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Threaded Mode
