Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 13/01/2013 14:23, Recliner wrote:
Mark Brader wrote: http://www.priceoftravel.com/595/pub...ldwide-cities/ So, it looks like they've overstated the minimum London fare, and included peak fares for routes from the centre to places well outside London when calculating the maximum fare. I wonder how wide ranging an area the fares they quote for other cities are? For Toronto it's the amalgamated city (former Metropolitan Toronto) plus the airport, approximately a rectangular area 25 miles by 10 miles. A flat single fare for any one trip including all transfers between bus, subway, and streetcar as needed. For the New York subway it's the four boroughs of Manhattan, Brooklyn, Queens, and the Bronx -- again, completely flat fare. Very roughly this is a triangular area 20 miles wide at the foot and 30 miles high, but there are areas within it that the subways don't reach. Buses cover this area plus Staten Island, which is about 15 miles long and up to 8 miles wide, and the island has its own rail service with one line. However, with buses the single fare only includes one transfer (between two buses or between bus and another mode). For Paris the Metro covers the city proper, roughly a circle 7 miles across, and a number of spurs running a mile or so outside. Again, completely flat fare, including transfers (and the use of the RER as part of the Metro inside the city only). Buses also cover the city proper, but not outside, there are no free transfers. For San Francisco the area would also be the city proper, which is about the same size as Paris. Rather than transfers, I believe they use a time system where your fare is good for any number of legs started within 2 hours, or some such rule. If you assume that the other cities cover smaller zones (eg, the Paris fares are for the Metro, not including the wider ranging RER), the true London range should only go out as far as zone 6... When different cities use different fare bases, it makes this sort of comparison very difficult. Showing a range of fares, as the site does, makes considerable sense, but as noted, it doesn't tell you how far you can go. Thanks for the info -- do the fares quoted look right for these cities? And do they, like London, have different off-peak fares? No. --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: --- |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Gospel Oak-Barking | London Transport | |||
Boys killed by Underground train in Barking | London Transport | |||
Barking-Greenford? | London Transport | |||
Stansted to Barking | London Transport | |||
Gospel Oak - Barking | London Transport |