Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 02 Mar 2013 22:34:54 +0000, Paul Corfield wrote:
Now how such a check can be done a tube or train when CBC acceptance is extended - that is a definite challenge! Is a new handheld device capable of reading such cards not possible? -- jhk |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , at 21:17:30 on
Sun, 3 Mar 2013, Jarle H Knudsen remarked: Now how such a check can be done a tube or train when CBC acceptance is extended - that is a definite challenge! Is a new handheld device capable of reading such cards not possible? Reading the cards isn't a problem. What the gripper needs to know is whether it was used "recently" to enter the system. Paywave cards don't store transaction history on them, so you'd need to be in contact with the bank's back-office systems. -- Roland Perry |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2013\03\03 20:41, Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 21:17:30 on Sun, 3 Mar 2013, Jarle H Knudsen remarked: Now how such a check can be done a tube or train when CBC acceptance is extended - that is a definite challenge! Is a new handheld device capable of reading such cards not possible? Reading the cards isn't a problem. What the gripper needs to know is whether it was used "recently" to enter the system. Paywave cards don't store transaction history on them, so you'd need to be in contact with the bank's back-office systems. Only if you wanted to arrest the person on the spot. If you have their bank account details and the time, you can work out at the end of the day whether they need to be summoned to court. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , at 13:06:44 on
Mon, 4 Mar 2013, Basil Jet remarked: Now how such a check can be done a tube or train when CBC acceptance is extended - that is a definite challenge! Is a new handheld device capable of reading such cards not possible? Reading the cards isn't a problem. What the gripper needs to know is whether it was used "recently" to enter the system. Paywave cards don't store transaction history on them, so you'd need to be in contact with the bank's back-office systems. Only if you wanted to arrest the person on the spot. If you have their bank account details and the time, you can work out at the end of the day whether they need to be summoned to court. You don't want to arrest them, rather than charge a penalty fare. So will there be a regime where the gripper takes a "swipe" from every such card offered, and then a post-processing of the penalty for all those where the card was either not swiped in originally, or the swipe-in was not properly registered? -- Roland Perry |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Roland Perry" wrote in message ... In message , at 13:06:44 on Mon, 4 Mar 2013, Basil Jet remarked: Now how such a check can be done a tube or train when CBC acceptance is extended - that is a definite challenge! Is a new handheld device capable of reading such cards not possible? Reading the cards isn't a problem. What the gripper needs to know is whether it was used "recently" to enter the system. Paywave cards don't store transaction history on them, so you'd need to be in contact with the bank's back-office systems. Only if you wanted to arrest the person on the spot. If you have their bank account details and the time, you can work out at the end of the day whether they need to be summoned to court. You don't want to arrest them, rather than charge a penalty fare. So will there be a regime where the gripper takes a "swipe" from every such card offered, and then a post-processing of the penalty for all those where the card was either not swiped in originally, or the swipe-in was not properly registered? Given that this is based upon wireless technology, there must be some scope for this information getting lost. I can't believe that retrospectively fining people because the gripper says that you were on the train but your bank account details don't show that you have paid, is going to stand up to expert court scrutiny. tiom |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
tim..... wrote on Mon, 4 Mar 2013
"Roland Perry" wrote in message ... In message , at 13:06:44 on Mon, 4 Mar 2013, Basil Jet remarked: Now how such a check can be done a tube or train when CBC acceptance is extended - that is a definite challenge! Is a new handheld device capable of reading such cards not possible? Reading the cards isn't a problem. What the gripper needs to know is whether it was used "recently" to enter the system. Paywave cards don't store transaction history on them, so you'd need to be in contact with the bank's back-office systems. Only if you wanted to arrest the person on the spot. If you have their bank account details and the time, you can work out at the end of the day whether they need to be summoned to court. You don't want to arrest them, rather than charge a penalty fare. So will there be a regime where the gripper takes a "swipe" from every such card offered, and then a post-processing of the penalty for all those where the card was either not swiped in originally, or the swipe-in was not properly registered? Given that this is based upon wireless technology, there must be some scope for this information getting lost. I can't believe that retrospectively fining people because the gripper says that you were on the train but your bank account details don't show that you have paid, is going to stand up to expert court scrutiny. Wouldn't you need to show at least that the system provides adequate feedback to the passenger at the time of swiping that a transaction has been provisionally accepted, and has a record of the acceptance? Will the innovation provide this? -- Iain Archer |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 4 Mar 2013 13:44:49 -0000, "tim....."
wrote: "Roland Perry" wrote in message ... You don't want to arrest them, rather than charge a penalty fare. So will there be a regime where the gripper takes a "swipe" from every such card offered, and then a post-processing of the penalty for all those where the card was either not swiped in originally, or the swipe-in was not properly registered? Given that this is based upon wireless technology, there must be some scope for this information getting lost. I'd say it's as acceptable (or not) as being found not to have, as the stickers say, a validated Oyster card. On the bus at least, it is IMO very difficult to claim that you didn't know whether your card had been accepted. I can't believe that retrospectively fining people because the gripper says that you were on the train but your bank account details don't show that you have paid, is going to stand up to expert court scrutiny. Well, it's not really a fine. It's a charge for not being able to demonstrate that you've done the right thing, as unfair as you might think that is. Richard. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , at 22:38:02 on
Mon, 4 Mar 2013, Richard remarked: I can't believe that retrospectively fining people because the gripper says that you were on the train but your bank account details don't show that you have paid, is going to stand up to expert court scrutiny. Well, it's not really a fine. It's a charge for not being able to demonstrate that you've done the right thing The Paywave terminals[1] don't give receipts, so it's quite difficult to demonstrate [2] that you've used the card. The objection is to in effect allowing your card to be used to collect a PF off all cardholders, which they'll nullify if it turns out later that you have paid. [1] eg on the gates into the tube. [2] To a gripper on the tube system, who probably won't have his own wireless connection back to the bank. -- Roland Perry |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
tim..... wrote:
I can't believe that retrospectively fining people because the gripper says that you were on the train but your bank account details don't show that you have paid, is going to stand up to expert court scrutiny. In Switzerland they're trying it... http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-21294241 Theo |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Theo Markettos wrote:
tim..... wrote: I can't believe that retrospectively fining people because the gripper says that you were on the train but your bank account details don't show that you have paid, is going to stand up to expert court scrutiny. In Switzerland they're trying it... http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-21294241 Interesting... They haven't franchised it to Connex, have they? it reminds me of Apple, famed for the good service in its shops, hiring a manager from Dixons to run the show. Needless to say, he didn't last long, and I imagine that the highly democratic Swiss won't stand for this much longer. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
fare evasion penalties | London Transport | |||
Bendy Buses & Fare Evasion | London Transport | |||
New style barriers and fare evasion | London Transport | |||
Thameslink Fare Evasion | London Transport | |||
Fare evasion | London Transport |