Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
d wrote: It would be even busier still if TfL hadn't decided it could get a few extra pieces of silver but having it just brush zone 1 so making it pointless as a detour to avoid paying the zone 1 fare. True - but IIRC, that was a decision imposed on TfL by DfT as a condition of TfL getting the funding to build the line in the first place. It might also help if the trains did a bit more than 25 mph everywhere. Depsite these points, it seems to be quite popular as it is! -- Mike Bristow |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 1 May 2013 13:15:35 +0100
Mike Bristow wrote: In article , d wrote: It would be even busier still if TfL hadn't decided it could get a few extra pieces of silver but having it just brush zone 1 so making it pointless as a detour to avoid paying the zone 1 fare. True - but IIRC, that was a decision imposed on TfL by DfT as a condition of TfL getting the funding to build the line in the first place. Was it? I can't see the rationale behind that. Seems a bit mean spirited. It might also help if the trains did a bit more than 25 mph everywhere. Depsite these points, it seems to be quite popular as it is! No doubt, but it could be even more popular and take some strain off the tube. If I had to commute to canary wharf I personally wouldn't bother to use it. The DLR or Jubilee seem a much better - and direct - option given they cost the same. -- Spud |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 01 May 2013 15:50:20 +0100
Paul Corfield wrote: needed. If Shoreditch High St had remained in Z2 then it is likely huge numbers of people would have changed onto the ELL to reach the City via SHS and Zone 2. If that abstraction had arisen then the DfT could have been lumbered with the bill for revenue support *or* there would have been demands from the TOCs for compensation from TfL. That is how the industry structure works. Figures. Industry first, passengers second, what a surprise. Still, I suppose if you're a City bound commuter and you don't mind a walk you can always get off at Hoxton going south or Whitechapel going north to avoid zone 1. I agree it is rather leisurely but I think the low running speeds and padded timetables are how the impressive performance stats are achieved. If everything was scheduled "on a knife edge" then it would take almost nothing to cause the service to run late and be delayed. But it would only be delayed on paper. It would still generally be quicker in practice. There are quite long stretches where 40mph is easily achievable with the acceleration of the trains. It seems a bit of a cop out to run them so slow. -- Spud |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2013\05\01 15:50, Paul Corfield wrote:
Yes it was. The rationale was to prevent astraction of revenue from TOCs running into London Bridge and Cannon St where a Z1 ticket is needed. If Shoreditch High St had remained in Z2 then it is likely huge numbers of people would have changed onto the ELL to reach the City via SHS and Zone 2. If that abstraction had arisen then the DfT could have been lumbered with the bill for revenue support *or* there would have been demands from the TOCs for compensation from TfL. That is how the industry structure works. I don't like the fact that the ELL has been placed on Z1 as it spoils the Z23 orbital concept but I am pleased we actually got the line built. They could make Shoreditch Zone 1 for entering or exiting, but Zone 2 for passing through. BTW, I still can't believe that they didn't just call that station "Shoreditch". The walk from the old station to the new one is about the same as the walk from Angel's old entrance to new one, but they didn't feel the need to rename Angel. And SHS is not in the High Street anyway. |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
hours. Building new railway stations costs a fortune. As George Osborne keep telling us, we haven't got fortunes to chuck around. Therefore public money should be spent only on projects which are going to benefit large numbers of people. |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
They show that it is lightly used. Certainly many other stations in London are also lightly used but they were built many years ago. They are not new builds as part of a new project. |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2013-05-02 06:40:58 +0000, said:
Hardly. The size of the pubic sector will still be as large Thank goodness for that. E. |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 1 May 2013 17:33:57 +0100
eastender wrote: On 2013-05-01 12:52:55 +0000, d said: If I had to commute to canary wharf I personally wouldn't bother to use it. The DLR or Jubilee seem a much better - and direct - option given they cost the same. Well, if like my wife you live in Dalston and work in Canary Wharf I bet you would use it, changing at either Shadwell or Canada Water. It only takes her about 20 mins to get there. Of course you could opt for the 277 bus instead - let's have a race. If your nearest station is on the ELL then sure. But if the ELL is just one option then I can't see the point. Why for example would anyone travelling down from finsbury park bother changing onto it at Highbury and be taken all around the houses and still have to change at canada water when they could just stay on the victoria line straight to green park then get the jubilee? -- Spud |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
ELL extension - Hoxton/Haggerstown. | London Transport | |||
The infamous West London Tram survey | London Transport | |||
motorcycle crash survey | London Transport | |||
RESULTS: The Grand uk.transport.london Geographical Survey | London Transport | |||
The Grand uk.transport.london Geographical Survey | London Transport |