Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ken Wheatley wrote:
On 2013-05-06 22:08:16 +0000, Neil Williams said: Recliner wrote: Why is this dramatic news? There have been many recent discussions here and elsewhere about how Heathrow might be expanded, given the need for a larger London hub airport and the extreme doubts about an all-new hub airport out in the Thames estuary. It'll also be BAA posturing given that to me the most sensible option (expanding Stansted and closing Heathrow or at least relegating it to a smaller operation, perhaps involving low-costs) will not exactly help their business. Neil I'd be interested to hear how you consider that expanding Stansted is the best option, given that several inquiries over several decades have failed to come to that conclusion, and that Stansted itself is now attracting only 80% of the business it did just a few years back.. Exactly. Heathrow is oversubscribed, while Stansted struggles for business. The customers want more capacity at Heathrow area, not east or northeast of London. The operator would prefer the cheaper, simpler third runway north of the current pair, but I think a more ambitious expansion to four is a better long term strategy. Incidentally, I've had occasion to pass through Beijing's busy Capital airport a couple of times in the last ten days, and it's interesting to see how much worse it is than Heathrow, despite its grand turtle-and-dragon Foster-designed Terminal 3, mixed mode operation on three runways: more walking, worse signage, much longer delays to take off, only bus links between terminals. And the free wi-fi in the business lounges is behind the Great Firewall, so lots of web sites are blocked. You also have to register with your passport to use the wi-fi. But at least it does have wi-fi and business lounges, unlike Pyongyang airport which instead sports a collection of parked elderly Russian planes. I also prefer the Rogers' Heathrow T5 to his Barajas T4, though MAD is less congested than LHR. The need to squash Heathrow's T5 into a limited space has made it more efficient than the indulgent, sprawling also-British-designed contemporaries in Beijing and Madrid. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Airport expansion: Heathrow runway 3 and Gatwick runway 2 constituteshortlist | London Transport | |||
Tories 20BN railway to replace Heathrow expansion (St Pancras isHeathrow T6, again) | London Transport | |||
DofT Deliberately Witholding Documents Heathrow Expansion? | London Transport | |||
Congestion charging expansion plans: zone expansion. | London Transport | |||
Public Transport Expansion | London Transport |