Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Last night, while trying to get from Gatwick Airport to E9, Google's journey planner came up the fastest route being via Clapham Junction and the Overground.
Gatwick to Whitechapel is £20.60 for an Anytime single; versus £11.20 for an Anytime single from Gatwick to Clapham Junction plus £1.50 off-peak Oyster single for the remainder of the journey. Obviously I went for the latter. With only a couple of minutes to make the change, I couldn't see any obvious Oyster validators on platforms 1&2. A man in a high visibility tabard with a roundel on the back directed me down to the subway, where I was told that I should lean over the gateline and tap in on the entry reader. Is this really how it's meant to be done? I was expecting a standalone reader on the platform - like on the Victoria Line at Finsbury Park. - martin |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 06:31:41AM -0700, martin wrote:
A man in a high visibility tabard wit= h a roundel on the back directed me down to the subway, where I was told th= at I should lean over the gateline and tap in on the entry reader. Is this really how it's meant to be done? I was expecting a standalone read= er on the platform - like on the Victoria Line at Finsbury Park. There certainly used to be Oyster things on platform 2. -- David Cantrell | Nth greatest programmer in the world I know that you believe you understand what you think you wrote, but I'm not sure you realize that what you wrote is not what you meant. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On 21/05/2013 11:25, David Cantrell wrote: On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 06:31:41AM -0700, martin wrote: A man in a high visibility tabard with a roundel on the back directed me down to the subway, where I was told that I should lean over the gateline and tap in on the entry reader. Is this really how it's meant to be done? I was expecting a standalone reader on the platform - like on the Victoria Line at Finsbury Park. There certainly used to be Oyster things on platform 2. No longer though. It possibly went when (or shortly after) Oyster PAYG was extended across NR in 2010. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Paul Corfield wrote:
There used to be "in / out" validators on the overground platform but they were removed when the works were done to expand the platforms and stairs for the new Overground service. I have read somewhere that SWT refused to have *any* Oyster validators on any platform at Clapham Junction because of fraud concerns. This forces people who need to break or start / end journeys to exit and re-enter. This applies for people with Travelcards who are within their validity. Solely using PAYG means you'd be charged via Z1 even if you didn't go that route because there is only one default fare for many origin / destination pairs. I suspect, but cannot prove, that this is also a demand from SWT which boosts their share of revenue for such journeys. Is this the same for travel from south London to east London via the, erm, new Overground route? (Are we supposed to call it the "South London Line" or is that name still for broader services?) A few weeks ago I was travelling back from Croydon and decided to give the new route a try. I couldn't find any platform readers at Clapham so assumed the system is sufficiently intelligent that they aren't need it and it would automatically know I'd gone this way. Later in the journey I used the pink validators at Canada Water which I've always understood to be a way of signalling travel outside Zone 1 but this thread has left me less sure. And just to complicate matters, I could in theory have taken a stopper from East Croydon and changed onto the East London line en route and gone nowhere near Clapham Junction without making any different touch ins and outs. -- My blog: http://adf.ly/4hi4c |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message of Sat, 25 May 2013
02:58:58 in uk.transport.london, Tim Roll-Pickering T.C.Roll- writes Paul Corfield wrote: There used to be "in / out" validators on the overground platform but they were removed when the works were done to expand the platforms and stairs for the new Overground service. I have read somewhere that SWT refused to have *any* Oyster validators on any platform at Clapham Junction because of fraud concerns. This forces people who need to break or start / end journeys to exit and re-enter. This applies for people with Travelcards who are within their validity. Solely using PAYG means you'd be charged via Z1 even if you didn't go that route because there is only one default fare for many origin / destination pairs. I suspect, but cannot prove, that this is also a demand from SWT which boosts their share of revenue for such journeys. Is this the same for travel from south London to east London via the, erm, new Overground route? (Are we supposed to call it the "South London Line" or is that name still for broader services?) A few weeks ago I was travelling back from Croydon and decided to give the new route a try. I couldn't find any platform readers at Clapham so assumed the system is sufficiently intelligent that they aren't need it and it would automatically know I'd gone this way. Later in the journey I used the pink validators at Canada Water which I've always understood to be a way of signalling travel outside Zone 1 but this thread has left me less sure. And just to complicate matters, I could in theory have taken a stopper from East Croydon and changed onto the East London line en route and gone nowhere near Clapham Junction without making any different touch ins and outs. The single fare finder http://www.tfl.gov.uk/tfl/tickets/faresandticket s/farefinder/current/default.aspx between East Croydon and Barking charges £6.20/£4.30 by default or £3.20/£2.20. For the latter prices, "... you must touch on the pink card reader on the Oyster route validator if interchanging at Canada Water or Whitechapel". Your going via Clapham Junction does not seem to affect that. The Journey Planner can be persuaded to select appropriate routes. e.g. by default http://journeyplanner.tfl.gov.uk/use...language=en&se ssionID=0&type_origin=stop&name_origin=east%20croy don&type_destination=s top&name_destination=barking%20underground%20stati on To cause Zone 1 to be avoided, I specify "via Shadwell" below: http://journeyplanner.tfl.gov.uk/use...language=en&se ssionID=0&type_origin=stop&name_origin=east%20croy don&type_destination=s top&name_destination=barking%20underground%20stati on&type_via=stop&name_ via=shadwell [As the journey planner URL interface sometimes finds "barking" ambiguous above, "barking underground station" is used instead. I can't get ambiguity consistently. ;(] The journeys avoiding zone 1 are about 5 minutes slower. [Pink card reader usage does not show on station ticket machines, but does show for known cards on online journey history.] Boundary interchange between the Oyster network and the National Rail network is unreasonably dealt with for customers using Pay As You Go. The OP's change at Clapham Junction shows this. My son makes occasional trips between zone 1 and Hershen. he is expected to touch out and in at Surbiton or not use Oyster. The original Oyster network seems to handle things well. cf. http://www.oyster-rail.org.uk/same-station- continuation-exits/ -- Walter Briscoe |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Clapham Junction Pink Oyster Reader | London Transport | |||
There's something wrong with the oyster readers at Watford Junction | London Transport | |||
Clapham Junction yesterday? | London Transport | |||
Clapham Junction | London Transport | |||
Network rail & Clapham Junction | London Transport |