Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The Department for Transport's Abbey Flyer recommendations rejected by London Midland
http://www.stalbansreview.co.uk/news...ondon_Midland/ 5:40pm Thursday 23rd May 2013 – St Albans & Harpenden Review Abbey Flyer recommendations rejected by London Midland London Midland has rejected the latest recommendations from the Department for Transport to improve the Abbey Flyer. Politicians from St Albans and Watford have written to the government department regarding their concerns about the service, which joins St Albans Abbey Station and Watford Junction, which is regularly cancelled and delayed. St Albans’ MP Anne Main and Watford MP Richard Harrington initially made contact to follow up a proposal made three years ago to move from a heavy rail system to light rail. However transport minister Norman Baker has written to the pair to say that this would not be possible due to the high cost to the taxpayer. Despite this, Mr Baker’s letter showed his concern about the current state of London Midland’s service. He said: "The franchising is still several years away and I would like to see improvements to the line which will benefit people who use it more quickly. "When funding and the business case permits, I would like to see the infrastructure along the line improved to enable a more frequent service to be introduced, such as by adding a new passing loop." However London Midland told the department that it is unable to allocate superior rolling stock on the line. Daniel Scaife, a spokesperson from the train operator, said: "We have worked hard to investigate a range of options to increase service frequency. "Our extensive testing of running trains faster on the single line demonstrated that, ultimately, infrastructure constraints prevent the introduction of a half-hourly service on the Abbey Line. "Achieving an increased frequency requires a significant upgrade in infrastructure including the installation of a passing loop which would allow trains to pass each other on the single line." Mr Harrington has hit out at the lack of improvements, saying that it is "not acceptable". He said: "It is called the Abbey Flyer but it is more like the abbey crawler. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 23/05/2013 17:58, wrote:
The Department for Transport's Abbey Flyer recommendations rejected by London Midland http://www.stalbansreview.co.uk/news...ondon_Midland/ 5:40pm Thursday 23rd May 2013 – St Albans & Harpenden Review For related news see http://www.hertsdirect.org/docs/pdf/a/alnews6.pdf In short, the light rail project has been abandoned hence the futile attempts to get LM to speed up the service (and reduce cancellations). Peter Lawrence |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Calls to improve the 'Cinderella service' Abbey Flyer | London Transport | |||
Five new London Midland trains to carry 1,600 extra passengers fromWatford and Bushey to london Euston from December | London Transport | |||
London Midland "logic" | London Transport | |||
London Midland - Smartcard introduction | London Transport | |||
London Underground book recommendations? | London Transport |