Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
On Tue, 4 Jun 2013 11:40:14 +0100 Mike Bristow wrote: In article , d wrote: Just naming lines after numbers or letters would be easier for all concerned, but you usually only get that if an entire system is planned from the start. It's also extremely boring, which is why I'd oppose it. Less confusing though. I *completely* disagree. Names are much easier to memorise and form associations with than apparently random letter/number combinations. If you'll forgive the reductio ad absurdum (which I know you won't,) by your theory we should drop station names and just give them reference numbers... |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Sponsored Tube Map | London Transport | |||
The Sponsored Tube Map | London Transport | |||
Our ways to reduce Vandalism (was: Ways to Reduce Vandalism) | London Transport | |||
Ways to Reduce Vandalism | London Transport | |||
Ways to Reduce Vandalism | London Transport |