Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 14/03/14 07:50, Jim Hawkins wrote:
Not by doctors. Is it not still the case that around 40% of all medical diagnoses are found to be wrong in autopsies? Ian |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 15 Mar 2014 16:08:52 +0000, The Real Doctor
wrote: On 14/03/14 07:50, Jim Hawkins wrote: Not by doctors. Is it not still the case that around 40% of all medical diagnoses are found to be wrong in autopsies? Some of it appears to be what is meant by "wrong". Someone carrying out an autopsy has the advantage of being able to have a good poke around and get things tested while e.g. a GP is limited to what can be detected from outside by mostly non-destructive means. While this can often find something undiagnosed or missed/ignored (and not necessarily relevant for consideration) it won't always change the substantive cause of death. A Grauniad article from 2012 :- http://www.theguardian.com/society/2...-four-patients refers to a study in England and Wales finding that "In 40% of the cases where there were mistakes" (possibly tracing back to the same source as yours) but some were "Chicken and Egg" cases as with the pneumonia v. lung cancer example in the article and others concerned whether or not certain diagnoses which were correct should also have been reported to a Coroner. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Dacre vs Crow | London Transport | |||
Bob Crow Eurosceptic? | London Transport | |||
Bob Crow is a Complete and Utter B*ST*RD! | London Transport | |||
Bob Crow Gets His Claim in 7 Years Early | London Transport | |||
Bob Crow | London Transport |