Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I received an email from my MP today asking me to sign a petition to stop
the council banning local residents from using a road being paid for with £7m of tax payers money. This is a new one on me. We have toll roads paid for with private money. Restricted access roads where everybody pays (such as the congestion charge) but this idea is completely new. Non residents will get to use this road but residents will get fined if they use it. Kevin "Sign my petition to let us use the new Link Road View this email in your browser Bushey Arches, West Watford and the ring road all suffer from traffic congestion, and we now have the opportunity to change this and alleviate some of the pressure on these routes – but I need your help or it may not happen! Around two years ago I secured £7million of funding from the Government toward a new Link Road, which will create access from the M1 via Dalton Way, to the back of the Hospital near Cardiff Road. This was excellent news and very welcome, it will undoubtedly relieve pressure by removing Hospital traffic from other routes, and will ensure faster response times with ambulances no longer having to battle their way down Vicarage Road. Since then however I have heard of the Council’s plans to install number plate recognition cameras along the Link Road to make sure that Watford residents cannot use it. Local residents using the new road to get home for example, would receive a fine. I do not believe that local residents are properly aware of this, and I want that to change. I also do not believe that preventing local people from using the road is fair; after all it is being paid for with public money. I have written to the Managing Director of Watford Borough Council and asked that, firstly, the cameras are not installed. This would mean residents of West Watford, Vicarage and Holywell could use the road without penalty – it would not alter the construction of the road itself. Secondly, I have asked the Council to put in ‘turns’ at Wiggenhall Road, to allow residents coming from Oxhey for example, to turn onto the Link Road so that they have an alternative route of access to the motorways. I think this is particularly important as no action has been taken to alleviate pressure at Bushey Arches for a number of years, and we should not miss this opportunity to take proper action. Therefore, while the road will ease some pressure and I do still support its construction, particularly for improved Hospital access, it could do so much more for local residents. This is an opportunity to finally make life easier for local residents travelling in and around Watford, and to ease congestion at Bushey Arches significantly, and this is not a chance I want us to miss out on" |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Friday, 6 June 2014 18:05:09 UTC+1, K wrote:
I received an email from my MP today asking me to sign a petition to stop the council banning local residents from using a road being paid for with £7m of tax payers money. This is a new one on me. We have toll roads paid for with private money. Restricted access roads where everybody pays (such as the congestion charge) but this idea is completely new. Non residents will get to use this road but residents will get fined if they use it. Kevin "Sign my petition to let us use the new Link Road View this email in your browser Bushey Arches, West Watford and the ring road all suffer from traffic congestion, and we now have the opportunity to change this and alleviate some of the pressure on these routes - but I need your help or it may not happen! Around two years ago I secured £7million of funding from the Government toward a new Link Road, which will create access from the M1 via Dalton Way, to the back of the Hospital near Cardiff Road. This was excellent news and very welcome, it will undoubtedly relieve pressure by removing Hospital traffic from other routes, and will ensure faster response times with ambulances no longer having to battle their way down Vicarage Road. Since then however I have heard of the Council's plans to install number plate recognition cameras along the Link Road to make sure that Watford residents cannot use it. Local residents using the new road to get home for example, would receive a fine. I do not believe that local residents are properly aware of this, and I want that to change. I also do not believe that preventing local people from using the road is fair; after all it is being paid for with public money. I have written to the Managing Director of Watford Borough Council and asked that, firstly, the cameras are not installed. This would mean residents of West Watford, Vicarage and Holywell could use the road without penalty - it would not alter the construction of the road itself. Secondly, I have asked the Council to put in 'turns' at Wiggenhall Road, to allow residents coming from Oxhey for example, to turn onto the Link Road so that they have an alternative route of access to the motorways. I think this is particularly important as no action has been taken to alleviate pressure at Bushey Arches for a number of years, and we should not miss this opportunity to take proper action. Therefore, while the road will ease some pressure and I do still support its construction, particularly for improved Hospital access, it could do so much more for local residents. This is an opportunity to finally make life easier for local residents travelling in and around Watford, and to ease congestion at Bushey Arches significantly, and this is not a chance I want us to miss out on" The MP has got it wrong. The proposal is that part of the new Link Road between the two new roundabouts would be for emergency vehicles only. There would be no distinction between residents and non-residents. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Matthew Dickinson" wrote in message
... On Friday, 6 June 2014 18:05:09 UTC+1, K wrote: I received an email from my MP today asking me to sign a petition to stop the council banning local residents from using a road being paid for with £7m of tax payers money. This is a new one on me. We have toll roads paid for with private money. Restricted access roads where everybody pays (such as the congestion charge) but this idea is completely new. Non residents will get to use this road but residents will get fined if they use it. Kevin "Sign my petition to let us use the new Link Road View this email in your browser Bushey Arches, West Watford and the ring road all suffer from traffic congestion, and we now have the opportunity to change this and alleviate some of the pressure on these routes - but I need your help or it may not happen! Around two years ago I secured £7million of funding from the Government toward a new Link Road, which will create access from the M1 via Dalton Way, to the back of the Hospital near Cardiff Road. This was excellent news and very welcome, it will undoubtedly relieve pressure by removing Hospital traffic from other routes, and will ensure faster response times with ambulances no longer having to battle their way down Vicarage Road. Since then however I have heard of the Council's plans to install number plate recognition cameras along the Link Road to make sure that Watford residents cannot use it. Local residents using the new road to get home for example, would receive a fine. I do not believe that local residents are properly aware of this, and I want that to change. I also do not believe that preventing local people from using the road is fair; after all it is being paid for with public money. I have written to the Managing Director of Watford Borough Council and asked that, firstly, the cameras are not installed. This would mean residents of West Watford, Vicarage and Holywell could use the road without penalty - it would not alter the construction of the road itself. Secondly, I have asked the Council to put in 'turns' at Wiggenhall Road, to allow residents coming from Oxhey for example, to turn onto the Link Road so that they have an alternative route of access to the motorways. I think this is particularly important as no action has been taken to alleviate pressure at Bushey Arches for a number of years, and we should not miss this opportunity to take proper action. Therefore, while the road will ease some pressure and I do still support its construction, particularly for improved Hospital access, it could do so much more for local residents. This is an opportunity to finally make life easier for local residents travelling in and around Watford, and to ease congestion at Bushey Arches significantly, and this is not a chance I want us to miss out on" The MP has got it wrong. The proposal is that part of the new Link Road between the two new roundabouts would be for emergency vehicles only. There would be no distinction between residents and non-residents. They are building a road purely for emergency vehicles. It gets better. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Kevin wrote on 06 June 2014 20:34:21 ...
"Matthew Dickinson" wrote in message ... On Friday, 6 June 2014 18:05:09 UTC+1, K wrote: I received an email from my MP today asking me to sign a petition to stop the council banning local residents from using a road being paid for with £7m of tax payers money. This is a new one on me. We have toll roads paid for with private money. Restricted access roads where everybody pays (such as the congestion charge) but this idea is completely new. Non residents will get to use this road but residents will get fined if they use it. Kevin "Sign my petition to let us use the new Link Road View this email in your browser Bushey Arches, West Watford and the ring road all suffer from traffic congestion, and we now have the opportunity to change this and alleviate some of the pressure on these routes - but I need your help or it may not happen! Around two years ago I secured £7million of funding from the Government toward a new Link Road, which will create access from the M1 via Dalton Way, to the back of the Hospital near Cardiff Road. This was excellent news and very welcome, it will undoubtedly relieve pressure by removing Hospital traffic from other routes, and will ensure faster response times with ambulances no longer having to battle their way down Vicarage Road. Since then however I have heard of the Council's plans to install number plate recognition cameras along the Link Road to make sure that Watford residents cannot use it. Local residents using the new road to get home for example, would receive a fine. I do not believe that local residents are properly aware of this, and I want that to change. I also do not believe that preventing local people from using the road is fair; after all it is being paid for with public money. I have written to the Managing Director of Watford Borough Council and asked that, firstly, the cameras are not installed. This would mean residents of West Watford, Vicarage and Holywell could use the road without penalty - it would not alter the construction of the road itself. Secondly, I have asked the Council to put in 'turns' at Wiggenhall Road, to allow residents coming from Oxhey for example, to turn onto the Link Road so that they have an alternative route of access to the motorways. I think this is particularly important as no action has been taken to alleviate pressure at Bushey Arches for a number of years, and we should not miss this opportunity to take proper action. Therefore, while the road will ease some pressure and I do still support its construction, particularly for improved Hospital access, it could do so much more for local residents. This is an opportunity to finally make life easier for local residents travelling in and around Watford, and to ease congestion at Bushey Arches significantly, and this is not a chance I want us to miss out on" The MP has got it wrong. The proposal is that part of the new Link Road between the two new roundabouts would be for emergency vehicles only. There would be no distinction between residents and non-residents. They are building a road purely for emergency vehicles. It gets better. 1. Get a newsreader that quotes properly. 2. Who is this incompetent MP who asks people to sign petitions rather than establishing the facts and asking the borough council directly? 3. There's nothing wrong in principle with restricting a stretch of road to emergency vehicles if the road network beyond the hospital doesn't have the capacity for hordes of rat-runners. 3. Find a more relevant newsgroup or forum. Local road issues in Watford are OT for utl. -- Richard J. (to email me, swap 'uk' and 'yon' in address) |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Richard J." wrote in message ...
3. Find a more relevant newsgroup or forum. Local road issues in Watford are OT for utl. -- Richard J. (to email me, swap 'uk' and 'yon' in address) There is a thread on the Abbey Flyer and no doubt the Met ext to Watford Junc will come up. If Watford can't be raised here then delete the Abbey Flyer thread. I have no idea why my news reader doesn't quote properly. Wasn't a problem before I went to Windows 7. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2014-06-06, Kevin wrote:
"Richard J." wrote in message ... 3. Find a more relevant newsgroup or forum. Local road issues in Watford are OT for utl. -- Richard J. (to email me, swap 'uk' and 'yon' in address) There is a thread on the Abbey Flyer and no doubt the Met ext to Watford Junc will come up. If Watford can't be raised here then delete the Abbey Flyer thread. I have no idea why my news reader doesn't quote properly. Wasn't a problem before I went to Windows 7. You replied below the previous poster's signature, so there will be readers who have not seen what you actually said. I had to bypass my newsreader's normal behaviour to get your words into this post to reply to them. Your newsreader software may be a bit stupid, but I suspect you could learn to use it so that your posts followed the normal Usenet conventions. As for OT, the Met is a London railway, even though it goes outside, as would the Abbey Flyer be if it were Overgrounded. The link road has no connection with London as such, though to be honest I would not have bothered to object. Eric -- ms fnd in a lbry |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Kevin wrote on 06 June 2014 22:45:56 ...
"Richard J." wrote in message ... 3. Find a more relevant newsgroup or forum. Local road issues in Watford are OT for utl. There is a thread on the Abbey Flyer and no doubt the Met ext to Watford Junc will come up. If Watford can't be raised here then delete the Abbey Flyer thread. Yes, good idea. The Met to Watford is clearly a London issue. But local road schemes in Watford aren't. I have no idea why my news reader doesn't quote properly. Wasn't a problem before I went to Windows 7. Your reader also retains the previous poster's sig, so your response appears as part of the sig, and is liable to be removed during the reply process. -- Richard J. (to email me, swap 'uk' and 'yon' in address) |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Eric" wrote in message ...
On 2014-06-06, Kevin wrote: "Richard J." wrote in message ... 3. Find a more relevant newsgroup or forum. Local road issues in Watford are OT for utl. -- Richard J. (to email me, swap 'uk' and 'yon' in address) There is a thread on the Abbey Flyer and no doubt the Met ext to Watford Junc will come up. If Watford can't be raised here then delete the Abbey Flyer thread. I have no idea why my news reader doesn't quote properly. Wasn't a problem before I went to Windows 7. You replied below the previous poster's signature, so there will be readers who have not seen what you actually said. I had to bypass my newsreader's normal behaviour to get your words into this post to reply to them. Your newsreader software may be a bit stupid, but I suspect you could learn to use it so that your posts followed the normal Usenet conventions. As for OT, the Met is a London railway, even though it goes outside, as would the Abbey Flyer be if it were Overgrounded. The link road has no connection with London as such, though to be honest I would not have bothered to object. Eric -- ms fnd in a lbry I don't get the point that you are making. The Abbey Flyer is not a London railway so why does the proposed take over by TfL get discussed here? When and if the Abbey Flyer becomes a TfL railway then it would become valid to discuss it even though it is in Herfordshire. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Richard J." wrote in message news
![]() Kevin wrote on 06 June 2014 22:45:56 ... "Richard J." wrote in message ... 3. Find a more relevant newsgroup or forum. Local road issues in Watford are OT for utl. There is a thread on the Abbey Flyer and no doubt the Met ext to Watford Junc will come up. If Watford can't be raised here then delete the Abbey Flyer thread. Yes, good idea. The Met to Watford is clearly a London issue. But local road schemes in Watford aren't. I have no idea why my news reader doesn't quote properly. Wasn't a problem before I went to Windows 7. Your reader also retains the previous poster's sig, so your response appears as part of the sig, and is liable to be removed during the reply process. -- Richard J. (to email me, swap 'uk' and 'yon' in address) Why is the Met in Watford "clearly" a London issue? |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , at 13:19:56 on
Sat, 7 Jun 2014, Kevin remarked: The Abbey Flyer is not a London railway so why does the proposed take over by TfL get discussed here? Because the "L" in TfL is London. ps You are still posting your replies into the signature field, many people won't either read or reply as a result. -- Roland Perry |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Private Roads | London Transport | |||
The effects of a road congestion tax | London Transport | |||
Big car owners face tax hike | London Transport | |||
Private contractor problems | London Transport | |||
Private roads | London Transport |