Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thursday, 26 June 2014 00:55:51 UTC+1, Paul Corfield wrote:
On Wed, 25 Jun 2014 23:00:36 +0100, " wrote: What are the plans for expanding contactless into other cities or further afield on NR? I think the Rail Delivery Group are considering the technology but beyond that I don't know. I am not aware that any of the city regions are considering contactless bank cards - they're all struggling to get ITSO based schemes into service. GMPTE is the only other area that I know of that is planning to introduce CPC. http://www.getmethere.com/about-getm...p#a-card-types |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , at 05:54:10
on Thu, 26 Jun 2014, remarked: Stagecoach have implemented limited smartcard facilities and handle bus passes automatically, That's the Stagecoach whose ITSO cards for SWT, EMT and Cambridgeshire buses are in no way interoperable? as do Whippet round here. Whippet *and* Whippet, surely. -- Roland Perry |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 26/06/2014 00:55, Paul Corfield wrote:
On Wed, 25 Jun 2014 23:00:36 +0100, " wrote: What are the plans for expanding contactless into other cities or further afield on NR? I think the Rail Delivery Group are considering the technology but beyond that I don't know. I am not aware that any of the city regions are considering contactless bank cards - they're all struggling to get ITSO based schemes into service. The only other scheme was First Group's move into smartcards for its buses - that scheme was based on bank card acceptance first plus ITSO for concessionary tickets. However progress has been very slow and I don't know if they even have a trial area operating. What is odd is that the technology should be very straightforward given there are known standards and a competitive supplier base. There must be horrendous issues with company processes, security and deployment issues given how incredibly slow the progress is with so many schemes - even when only in one company. Multi operator schemes in deregulated areas will always be hard as no one can force the bus companies to take part and there's always the issue of "who pays?". Isn't that a bit of a waste of time and resources to work on introducing ITSO, when eventually everybody will go over to contactless? |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ... On 26/06/2014 00:55, Paul Corfield wrote: On Wed, 25 Jun 2014 23:00:36 +0100, " wrote: What are the plans for expanding contactless into other cities or further afield on NR? I think the Rail Delivery Group are considering the technology but beyond that I don't know. I am not aware that any of the city regions are considering contactless bank cards - they're all struggling to get ITSO based schemes into service. The only other scheme was First Group's move into smartcards for its buses - that scheme was based on bank card acceptance first plus ITSO for concessionary tickets. However progress has been very slow and I don't know if they even have a trial area operating. What is odd is that the technology should be very straightforward given there are known standards and a competitive supplier base. There must be horrendous issues with company processes, security and deployment issues given how incredibly slow the progress is with so many schemes - even when only in one company. Multi operator schemes in deregulated areas will always be hard as no one can force the bus companies to take part and there's always the issue of "who pays?". Isn't that a bit of a waste of time and resources to work on introducing ITSO, when eventually everybody will go over to contactless? the comment from others suggest that that wont be happening, any time soon tim |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , at 22:15:28 on Thu, 26 Jun
2014, " remarked: What are the plans for expanding contactless into other cities or further afield on NR? I think the Rail Delivery Group are considering the technology but beyond that I don't know. I am not aware that any of the city regions are considering contactless bank cards - they're all struggling to get ITSO based schemes into service. .... Isn't that a bit of a waste of time and resources to work on introducing ITSO, when eventually everybody will go over to contactless? ITSO is much simpler than contactless, especially because it stores products on the card rather than in a collection of databases. Therefore a season ticket on ITSO will work the barriers where-ever it's valid, without the need to be sending data off to the central computers every time it's touched. Far better for the customer too if an off-route touch refuses entry, than produces an unexpected and potentially punitive day-ticket for that trip, once the sums have been done a day later. -- Roland Perry |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Paul Corfield" wrote in message ... On Thu, 26 Jun 2014 22:15:28 +0100, " wrote: Their main experience of CBCs will, of course, be when TfL launches their facility that will cover the zonal area. It will be interesting to see what happens to the relative balance of ticket products and sales. The London TOCs that were so resistant to Oyster were perfectly delighted to see their ridership and revenue soar once it was extended to their services. Did that really happen? I find it hard to believe that a near doubling of fares (introduction of Oyster Zonal pricing has removed the 49% day return discount, without making the one way journey any cheaper) resulted in increased ridership tim |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
London Underground gate revenue protection technology | London Transport | |||
"Flooding risk to Thames tunnels" | London Transport | |||
New National Security Technology ignored that might have stopped the bombing | London Transport | |||
Technology for its own sake? | London Transport |