Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"tim....." wrote:
"Roland Perry" wrote in message ... In message , at 17:34:06 on Sat, 27 Sep 2014, tim..... remarked: The extra train, new stations and additional track will also need to be maintained. Is that really a noticeable percentage of 28 million? Why do you think this particular stretch of line will pay its operating costs from revenue, when the system taken as a whole doesn't? [Tube fares are about £1.6BN, operating costs about £2.4BN, capital costs on top of that]. How does that answer my question? It doesn't, but previous answers did: the link is projected to make a modest operating surplus, which will go towards servicing the capital cost; if it ever repays the capital, the surplus will be shared between HHC and TfL. It is estimated to have a relatively low B/C ratio, just enough to be worth doing, but not enough to have made it a high priority. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Croxley Link progress | London Transport | |||
Croxley Link progress | London Transport | |||
Future is bleak for Croxley Rail Link | London Transport | |||
No funding for Croxley link | London Transport | |||
Croxley Link news | London Transport |