Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter Able stuck@home wrote:
On 28/09/2014 10:19, Recliner wrote: Roland Perry wrote: And I suppose many of the additional fares will be to Zone 1, and therefore quite expensive. I hope they don't take such a simplistic view of the extra fares. Quite a bit of traffic to Z1 will be abstracted from existing stations. Let's hope not. But obviously there will be net additional fares from zones 7&8, and therefore expensive if to London. It is ironic that one of the rationales given in the past for closing Chesham is that little traffic will be lost, the bulk being transferred to Amersham and Chalfont. Here we have the same situation in reverse. How realistic is it to "hope" that the Croxley link will generate £500k of NEW business per week? Yes, put like that, it does look rather optimistic. I wonder if that's the projected fare revenue in a few years, once new developments are in place around the new stations? It's hard to envisage such high net revenue increases in the first year or two. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Croxley Link progress | London Transport | |||
Croxley Link progress | London Transport | |||
Future is bleak for Croxley Rail Link | London Transport | |||
No funding for Croxley link | London Transport | |||
Croxley Link news | London Transport |