Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , at 23:51:56 on Mon, 6 Oct
2014, Neil Williams remarked: Hardly - they're complete opposites. The NLL links up the spokes on a wheel and provides a quicker alternative to going into london and out again , whereas the croxley link provides a much longer route to watford than the alternatives. That it does, but where it might win out is the "lazy journey" option for those working in the northern parts of the City easily reachable from Moorgate, Barbican, Liverpool St and Aldgate. Along similar lines, were what you say true Bedford commuters would always use the fast EMT services, yet quite a lot of them use Thameslink because it provides a single-train journey. There are only two EMT trains from Bedford in the morning that are timed as useful to commuters, arriving St Pancras at 7:48* and 8:39 The evening peak is inherently more spread out, and there's a better choice of departures at 17:00, 17:30, 18:00* and 18:30 * via Corby services, so might be a 5-car train only. -- Roland Perry |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Croxley Link progress | London Transport | |||
Croxley Link progress | London Transport | |||
Future is bleak for Croxley Rail Link | London Transport | |||
No funding for Croxley link | London Transport | |||
Croxley Link news | London Transport |