On 2014\12\13 19:58, Michael R N Dolbear wrote:

"D A Stocks" wrote

"Michael R N Dolbear" wrote

Your ticket will be accepted on London Underground Jubilee Line
services from London Waterloo – London Bridge only.

In the event the Jubilee Line becomes so overcrowded as to be unusable
what
(apart from armies of on-train ticket inspectors) would stop someone using
the Northern Line via a change at Kennington (or even Euston!) instead?

Or via Elephant & Castle.

Nothing, unless you are gripped on the way and even then it's unlikely
to be noticed.

Would an inspector care provided you were still in Zone 1 ?

Your National Rail ticket hasn't given you carte blanche to use all of
zone 1.

"Roland Perry" wrote in message
news
In message , at 19:18:56 on Fri, 12 Dec
2014, Michael R N Dolbear remarked:

From the 12 January 2015, South West Trains passengers will be unable to
interchange at Waterloo East for London Bridge as services will not be
stopping at London Bridge. This is expected to continue until August 2016.

How many people made that change?

Or does the London Bridge works mean that some people will be commuting
into Waterloo and connecting to LB, rather than commuting direct to LB?

I don't think so

all of the SET services that are no longer running to CX are diverted to Vic

tim

In message , at 11:51:18 on Sun, 14 Dec
2014, tim..... remarked:
From the 12 January 2015, South West Trains passengers will be unable
to interchange at Waterloo East for London Bridge as services will
not be stopping at London Bridge. This is expected to continue until
August 2016.

How many people made that change?

Or does the London Bridge works mean that some people will be
commuting into Waterloo and connecting to LB, rather than commuting
direct to LB?

I don't think so

all of the SET services that are no longer running to CX are diverted to Vic

Do any of those services have a possibility of changing at Clapham
Junction for Waterloo?
--
Roland Perry

"Roland Perry" wrote in message
...
In message , at 11:51:18 on Sun, 14 Dec
2014, tim..... remarked:
From the 12 January 2015, South West Trains passengers will be unable to
interchange at Waterloo East for London Bridge as services will not be
stopping at London Bridge. This is expected to continue until August
2016.

How many people made that change?

Or does the London Bridge works mean that some people will be commuting
into Waterloo and connecting to LB, rather than commuting direct to LB?

I don't think so

all of the SET services that are no longer running to CX are diverted to
Vic

Do any of those services have a possibility of changing at Clapham
Junction for Waterloo?

No

On 2014\12\14 11:51, tim..... wrote:

"Roland Perry" wrote in message
news
In message , at 19:18:56 on Fri, 12
Dec 2014, Michael R N Dolbear remarked:

From the 12 January 2015, South West Trains passengers will be unable
to interchange at Waterloo East for London Bridge as services will
not be stopping at London Bridge. This is expected to continue until
August 2016.

How many people made that change?

Or does the London Bridge works mean that some people will be
commuting into Waterloo and connecting to LB, rather than commuting
direct to LB?

I don't think so

all of the SET services that are no longer running to CX are diverted to
Vic

Wow. How the hell is there room for them? Are loads of local trains
being scrapped, the way the entire Hertford Loop service got canned
after the Potters Bar disaster?

In article , (Roland Perry)
wrote:

In message , at 11:51:18 on Sun, 14
Dec 2014, tim..... remarked:
From the 12 January 2015, South West Trains passengers will be unable
to interchange at Waterloo East for London Bridge as services will
not be stopping at London Bridge. This is expected to continue until
August 2016.

How many people made that change?

Or does the London Bridge works mean that some people will be
commuting into Waterloo and connecting to LB, rather than commuting
direct to LB?

I don't think so

all of the SET services that are no longer running to CX are diverted to
Vic

Do any of those services have a possibility of changing at Clapham
Junction for Waterloo?

How would they manage that?

--
Colin Rosenstiel

In message , at 12:26:40
on Sun, 14 Dec 2014, remarked:
all of the SET services that are no longer running to CX are diverted to
Vic

Do any of those services have a possibility of changing at Clapham
Junction for Waterloo?

How would they manage that?

Dunno. I was under the impression that Clapham Junction also served some
trains to Victoria.
--
Roland Perry

"Basil Jet" wrote in message
...
On 2014\12\14 11:51, tim..... wrote:


all of the SET services that are no longer running to CX are diverted to
Vic

Wow. How the hell is there room for them? Are loads of local trains being
scrapped, the way the entire Hertford Loop service got canned after the
Potters Bar disaster?


I think you've mis-understood the post.

AIUI most SET services to/from CX will continue to run to/from CX. None of
these services will be able to call at LBG.

Some CX services will be diverted. All diverted CX services will go to VIC
instead.

--
DAS

"Roland Perry" wrote in message
...
In message , at 12:26:40 on
Sun, 14 Dec 2014, remarked:
all of the SET services that are no longer running to CX are diverted
to
Vic

Do any of those services have a possibility of changing at Clapham
Junction for Waterloo?

How would they manage that?

Dunno. I was under the impression that Clapham Junction also served some
trains to Victoria.

but not those on SEC metals

tim

In article , (Roland Perry)
wrote:

In message , at
12:26:40 on Sun, 14 Dec 2014, remarked:
all of the SET services that are no longer running to CX are diverted
to Vic

Do any of those services have a possibility of changing at Clapham
Junction for Waterloo?

How would they manage that?

Dunno. I was under the impression that Clapham Junction also served
some trains to Victoria.

*South Eastern* trains? By what route? How much do you know of the layout in
the Clapham Junction to Battersea area?

--
Colin Rosenstiel