London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old December 19th 14, 10:37 AM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Sep 2008
Posts: 4,877
Default Croxley Rail Link: London Underground could take over construction of £230m project

In article ,
(Paul Corfield) wrote:

On Fri, 19 Dec 2014 08:56:40 +0000, Peter Lawrence
wrote:

In other words, they have not decided what the project is to do nor who
is to run it but have doubled the cost estimate and added 6 months to
the time scale.


It has been clear for many months that LU would be the operator and
that the line would transfer to them upon completion. There is an
agreement that went to the TfL Board that sets out the party's
responsibilities.

I suspect they have had the usual cost escalation once they started
confirming assumptions and looked at future train service patterns.
That's undoubtedly what has triggered the power and track related
changes on the NR tracks into Watford. There is a notorious lack of
asset knowledge in NR so it's no great shock that you get scope creep.
It is possible that there is a wish to run a more frequent service
into WJ and to Amersham. That may also have affected the power design
assumptions.


Wouldn't an element of the power supply costs be wanted for the plan to
extend the Bakerloo to Watford Junction once more? What's happening with
that plan, by the way?

I also suspect that HCC have decided they are not best placed, given
impending spending cuts, to manage a rail project effectively. LU do
have more experience and making them responsible for construction
should make bringing the line into service a rather smoother process.


Very true.

--
Colin Rosenstiel
  #2   Report Post  
Old December 19th 14, 01:10 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Oct 2014
Posts: 2,990
Default Croxley Rail Link: London Underground could take over construction of £230m project

On Fri, 19 Dec 2014 05:37:22 -0600,
wrote:

In article ,
(Paul Corfield) wrote:

On Fri, 19 Dec 2014 08:56:40 +0000, Peter Lawrence
wrote:

In other words, they have not decided what the project is to do nor who
is to run it but have doubled the cost estimate and added 6 months to
the time scale.


It has been clear for many months that LU would be the operator and
that the line would transfer to them upon completion. There is an
agreement that went to the TfL Board that sets out the party's
responsibilities.

I suspect they have had the usual cost escalation once they started
confirming assumptions and looked at future train service patterns.
That's undoubtedly what has triggered the power and track related
changes on the NR tracks into Watford. There is a notorious lack of
asset knowledge in NR so it's no great shock that you get scope creep.
It is possible that there is a wish to run a more frequent service
into WJ and to Amersham. That may also have affected the power design
assumptions.


Wouldn't an element of the power supply costs be wanted for the plan to
extend the Bakerloo to Watford Junction once more? What's happening with
that plan, by the way?


Long abandoned, surely? And even it hadn't been, there wouldn't be
room at Watford Junction for the Bakerloo trains to terminate, along
with the Met and LO trains.
  #4   Report Post  
Old December 19th 14, 07:40 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Oct 2014
Posts: 2,990
Default Croxley Rail Link: London Underground could take over construction of £230

wrote:
In article ,
(Recliner) wrote:

On Fri, 19 Dec 2014 05:37:22 -0600,

wrote:


Wouldn't an element of the power supply costs be wanted for the plan to
extend the Bakerloo to Watford Junction once more? What's happening with
that plan, by the way?


Long abandoned, surely? And even it hadn't been, there wouldn't be
room at Watford Junction for the Bakerloo trains to terminate, along
with the Met and LO trains.


Not what I understood to have been said.


From
http://www.londonreconnections.com/2...nd-tube-lines/

"Queens Park to Watford Junction. Watford Junction in retrospect was really
too far out for a tube line and the Bakerloo line nowadays does not go
beyond Harrow and Wealdstone. Now that TfL have control of the surface line
from Euston to Watford Junction their enthusiasm for extending the Bakerloo
line to Watford Junction seems to have vanished."
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
BBC - Crossrail gets £230m BAA funding Mizter T London Transport 2 November 7th 08 03:10 PM
Croxley Rail Link - Position Update October 2007 burkey London Transport 1 October 28th 07 07:58 PM
Croxley Rail Link Petition burkey London Transport 42 April 19th 07 07:57 PM
CROXLEY RAIL LINK - POSITION UPDATE - February 2007 burkey London Transport 4 March 6th 07 01:06 PM
Future is bleak for Croxley Rail Link JWBA68 London Transport 8 January 28th 04 12:53 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:08 AM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 London Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about London Transport"

 

Copyright © 2017