Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 10:30:30 on Fri, 5 Jun 2015, e27002 aurora remarked: Given the cost of the project, it seems a shame that if they want to provide a service for Windsor they couldn't have built a tunnel at Slough and actually gone to Windsor. But I don't understand why they don't turn at Slough... is the bay platform gone? Agreed, omitting the Windsor branch was an error. Is Windsor station long enough, Maybe not. That is outwith my knowledge. However, given the scale of Crossra,il solving that issue would be small potatoes. Have you been to the station? It's a single track about 4 coaches long. and are you happy to reduce the service frequency west of Slough as a result? Not at all. But, one would be delighted to see more trains west of Westbourne Park. The number of trains in the core is fixed, so not much prospect of movement there. The reduction would be west of Slough, on account of trains going to Windsor rather than Maidenhead. There could be fewer Paddington reversers. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Crossrail tunnelling complete | London Transport | |||
Crossrail tunneling complete | London Transport | |||
Crossrail tunnelling pictures | London Transport | |||
Crossrail tunnelling to start shortly | London Transport | |||
Crossrail tunnelling to start shortly | London Transport |