Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , at 22:45:48 on
Wed, 17 Jun 2015, Charles Ellson remarked: But surely in order to prosecute him, despite his losing his wallet he must have produced some form of valid ID ? Or that he simply told te truth about where he lived. I've had an envelope (returned "not known at this address") from the GNER grippers' office addressed to a local scrote (uncommon name, previous case in local papers) who had given my address but with a dud postcode so the address at least is a matter of trusting someone to be telling the truth. You've missed the point. Prosecuting someone who gives a false address is more difficult, but in this case they were able to easily because he gave a correct address. That wasn't missed. I was mentioning a further example supporting that persons are routinely trusted to supply their true address unsupported by further proof. If they don't have any proof on them, what else can be done in such circumstances. Having them arrested and given a ride home in a police car to find some ID is a big ask. -- Roland Perry |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
A tale of idiot REOs | London Transport | |||
"Passenger action" | London Transport | |||
"Mind the Gap" - Radio programme | London Transport | |||
What's the LAW/RULING on TEA-BREAKS at WORK | London Transport |