Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#22
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think the fact that the Aldwych - Holborn shuttle service was so under
used was the reason for any extension being killed off early on. The shuttle is actually 2 lines but one was shut down early on in its life and the service became a single line service from there on. LU may have had plans to use the tunnels and track as part of a greater plan, but so far this hasn't happened, but who knows what tomorrow may bring. Bakerloo BadBoy "Sam Holloway" wrote in message ... I was reading an edition of "London's Underground" (1) from the mid-1960s, and it mentions three extension proposals that were ongoing at the time. Two of these - the Victoria extension to Brixton and the Fleet Line - went ahead (although of course the plans for the Fleet Line changed greatly over the successive years). The third was extending the Aldwych branch of the Piccadilly through to Waterloo. I was aware that this had been considered as it's been mentioned here before, and on a couple of websites, including CULG. But what I didn't know is that, according to this book, the necessary 'powers have been granted'. That implies planning got to a rather advanced stage. So my question : is that really the case, and what happened that brought things to a halt? Sam (1) Don't have the book to hand so can't give accurate title, author or publication date, but I can do so at a later stage if it's of help. -- Sam Holloway, Cambridge |
#23
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Just me and the world" wrote in message ...
I think the fact that the Aldwych - Holborn shuttle service was so under used was the reason for any extension being killed off early on. The shuttle is actually 2 lines but one was shut down early on in its life and the service became a single line service from there on. LU may have had plans to use the tunnels and track as part of a greater plan, but so far this hasn't happened, but who knows what tomorrow may bring. Bakerloo BadBoy I remember reading in one of the innumerable books at Museum that the Aldwych extension would never had existed if the consortium responsible for building the Holborn - Finsbury Park stretch of the GNP&BR could have gotten out of it. IIRC it was implied that it was deliberately obfuscated at the Holborn end to try to provide excuses for construction of it to stop. If there had been a proper branch connection at Holborn, would Aldwych have been more useful? Brad P.S: Needs less top-posting in u.t.l. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
How much was a ticket for the underground in the 60s? | London Transport | |||
Validity of Local Authority "Over 60s" free bus passes ? | London Transport | |||
Kings Cross development proposals and Cross River Tram Link | London Transport | |||
Olympic bid transport proposals | London Transport | |||
New Thameslink 2000 proposals? | London Transport |