Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
passenger - with the regulation camera - and a member of staff in civilian clothes who seemed to be the guard. He said the reason for the service was to maintain Chiltern's right of way into Paddington and seemed to think that staff training was a secondary consideration. He also confirmed there was no chance of Chiltern sending more trains to Paddington because of a lack of train paths and platforms. Does anyone know why there are such severe speed limits on this line? The parallel Central Line moves quite quickly and the track seems to be well- maintained. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2015\09\18 16:54, Robin9 wrote:
I travelled on this train this morning. Very interesting. There was one other passenger - with the regulation camera - and a member of staff in civilian clothes who seemed to be the guard. He said the reason for the service was to maintain Chiltern's right of way into Paddington and seemed to think that staff training was a secondary consideration. He also confirmed there was no chance of Chiltern sending more trains to Paddington because of a lack of train paths and platforms. What use is maintaining Chiltern's "right of way" if they don't have the right to more than one path a day? |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Last edited by Robin9 : September 19th 15 at 11:01 PM |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Basil Jet wrote:
On 2015\09\18 16:54, Robin9 wrote: I travelled on this train this morning. Very interesting. There was one other passenger - with the regulation camera - and a member of staff in civilian clothes who seemed to be the guard. He said the reason for the service was to maintain Chiltern's right of way into Paddington and seemed to think that staff training was a secondary consideration. He also confirmed there was no chance of Chiltern sending more trains to Paddington because of a lack of train paths and platforms. What use is maintaining Chiltern's "right of way" if they don't have the right to more than one path a day? The main use is as a diversionary route at weekends if Marylebone is closed. Peter Smyth |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2015\09\19 00:22, Paul Corfield wrote:
On Fri, 18 Sep 2015 21:58:06 +0100, Basil Jet wrote: On 2015\09\18 16:54, Robin9 wrote: I travelled on this train this morning. Very interesting. There was one other passenger - with the regulation camera - and a member of staff in civilian clothes who seemed to be the guard. He said the reason for the service was to maintain Chiltern's right of way into Paddington and seemed to think that staff training was a secondary consideration. He also confirmed there was no chance of Chiltern sending more trains to Paddington because of a lack of train paths and platforms. What use is maintaining Chiltern's "right of way" if they don't have the right to more than one path a day? It avoids the horror, for the DfT, of going through the formal closure procedure. DfT are undboubtedly happy to avoid drawing any attention to the route, its appalling condition and the poor train service. If people became aware of the route all sorts of outrageous demands, like a decent train service or, horror of horrors, linking into Crossrail might be suggested and we can't have that. You can guarantee that if anyone did anything about closing the service in the next few months that it'd become a Mayoral election issue in West London and London Travelwatch would never, ever agree to a closure of a main line link into a London terminal. That sounds far more likely than Chiltern wanting to maintain a right of way. I'm wondering... if a link from the line to the West London line was built, perhaps using an S-shaped curve from just south of Old Oak Common Depot to Hythe Road / Salter Street, would an hourly service from, say Aylesbury and Princes Risborough to Shepherds Bush and further (say, Brixton and Orpington) be popular? And would that remove the legal need for the daily Chiltern service to Paddington, and the parliamentary bus service from Ealing to Wandsworth Road? |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wednesday, 5 August 2015 13:48:37 UTC+1, Recliner wrote:
As most people here must know, Chiltern runs one service a day, M-F, to Paddington. There is a YouTube video about this, dated 7/12/2017, at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5KiZGRA_yCE in case anyone's interested. It came up in my recommended videos column, which is slightly worrying. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
That YouTube video was sent to me too. It's misleading in that
it does not mention the inbound journey from South Ruislip to Paddington. I also question the forthright assertion that Chiltern are required to run this service. If that is correct, why were Chiltern originally allowed to terminate at West Ruislip? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Paddington Bear at Paddington Station | London Transport | |||
Chiltern Services Between Amersham & Harrow | London Transport | |||
Chiltern & the online live departure boards | London Transport | |||
Chiltern line at Marylebone this Evening | London Transport | |||
Chiltern plans for West Hampstead | London Transport |