Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ian F." wrote in message ... "Bradley H. Davis" wrote in message .. . Why do the drivers of the train waiting on the northbound Charing Cross platform *At Kennington*... Ian |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ian F. wrote:
"Bradley H. Davis" wrote in message .. . Anytime. Right - you asked for it! ;-) Why do the drivers of the train waiting on the northbound Charing Cross platform always time it so that the minute the northbound City line train arrives, they take off, leaving those of us changing lines to wait for the next one? It's almost as though they do it on purpose - you should hear some of the comments! Surely it can't hurt to wait and extra 30 seconds? Well, yes, it *can* hurt. If you are running a service at 2-minute intervals, then an extra 30 seconds means a 25% increase in headway, which means a 25% increase in the number of passengers waiting at the next station. At busy times, that will increase the dwell time at the station, which then increases the number of passengers at subsequent stations even further, which then increases the dwell time even further, and so on. Are you seriously suggesting that you should get priority over the many hundreds of passengers that would be delayed by holding the trains especially for you? -- Richard J. (to e-mail me, swap uk and yon in address) |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Richard J." wrote in message
... Well, yes, it *can* hurt. If you are running a service at 2-minute intervals, then an extra 30 seconds means a 25% increase in headway, which means a 25% increase in the number of passengers waiting at the next station. At busy times, that will increase the dwell time at the station, which then increases the number of passengers at subsequent stations even further, which then increases the dwell time even further, and so on. Are you seriously suggesting that you should get priority over the many hundreds of passengers that would be delayed by holding the trains especially for you? I see your point, but it's just like it's done to annoy. Is it not possible for the schedules be planned in such a way as to meet incoming City branch trains - at least for the Charing Cross trains that actually start from Kennington? Ian |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in message
... snipsnippitysnipsnip Thanks for the explanation, Roger, which is easy to understand for we non-transporttechies and a breath of fresh air to everyone who, like me, thinks that the majority of tube drivers don't give a monkey's about the poor, miserable punters. Long may you drive! Ian |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bradley H. Davis" wrote in message .. . I am a driver on the Northern and before I went off on a two week vacation, the *rumour* was that regular service to all Northern Line destinations via both Bank and Charing Cross was being resumed on March 7. As I don't go back there until Tuesday night I can't confirm this. I know this isn't exactly concrete information, but that's the last I heard!! Thanks Bradley. If you hear anything more, could you let us know? Alan |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Paul Corfield" wrote in message ... There is a new timetable in place now that restores old service frequencies but with the fixed service pattern. The new crossover is in place but fixed out of use. The testing and assurance process is being done now. I had to review documentation about testing equipment today so testing work can occur tonight. There were also tests last night. The intention is to ensure the new installation is fully safe to brought into full "moving" service and that depends on the results gathered from the tests. On the assumption everything gets signed off then I understand there is a time period before the all singing, all dancing service pattern can be brought back into use. I am afraid I do not know how long that time period is. I can assure you that a lot of work is being done to get the service restored. Hope that helps. -- Paul C Thanks Paul. Didn't realise LU staff read this group! I guess I just wanted to know what the intention was as I'd heard "Ken had spoken" and said the line was going to stay in its present state. Alan |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Design the Piccadilly line station of the future! | London Transport | |||
Future of CDRs and NR season tickets in TfL zones? | London Transport | |||
TfL Vision of the Future map | London Transport | |||
Discussion on the future of commuting 20th May 2004 | London Transport | |||
Future is bleak for Croxley Rail Link | London Transport |